2015
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Claiming Rights To Mobility Through The Right To Inhabitance: Discursive Articulations from Civic Actors in Montreal

Abstract: How do claims for rights to mobility intersect with grievances pertaining to spatial justice in the city? This article addresses the issue by studying the concrete connections made by activists promoting car alternatives in Montreal. The activists' discursive categories point to the centrality of their conditions of inhabitance in their claims for certain rights to mobility. The discourses are analysed in the context of demands for safe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The ways in which politicians and policy‐makers present the problem limits political debate. Case studies on the Turcot Interchange in Quebec (Van Neste and Sénécal, ) and the Via Parque Rímac expressway in Lima (Strauch, Takano and Hordijk, ) demonstrate that the emphasis on infrastructure facilitating automobility was politically framed as an essential prerequisite for local economic development. Such highly politicised solutions leave no room for a redefinition of the mobility problem beyond automobility, thereby disregarding the transportation needs of the communities directly affected by the motorways.…”
Section: The Urban Mobility Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ways in which politicians and policy‐makers present the problem limits political debate. Case studies on the Turcot Interchange in Quebec (Van Neste and Sénécal, ) and the Via Parque Rímac expressway in Lima (Strauch, Takano and Hordijk, ) demonstrate that the emphasis on infrastructure facilitating automobility was politically framed as an essential prerequisite for local economic development. Such highly politicised solutions leave no room for a redefinition of the mobility problem beyond automobility, thereby disregarding the transportation needs of the communities directly affected by the motorways.…”
Section: The Urban Mobility Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending the intimate connection between physical infrastructure as the final outcome of a process and its initiation we see that there are important planning infrastructural requirements, as shown by Van Neste and Sénécal (2018). In a study of francophone Canada, they explore the way in which shifting to a more sustainable transport policy was facilitated only through recognition of the multiple agencies which were affected.…”
Section: Physical Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synergy effects obtained due to relatively short distances between service points and public transport nodes have great importance in shaping the residents' spatial behaviours. Thus, appropriate urban planning can frame the issues of mobility and accessibility by promoting certain locations (and densities) and through investments in infrastructure for walking or cycling (Van Neste & Sénécal, 2015).…”
Section: Implications For Urban Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%