Cladribine Plus Rituximab Is An Effective Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Abstract

4910 Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is incurable with standard chemotherapy and remains a therapeutic challenge. Despite improved outcomes in MCL there is no consensus on the best initial treatment. Options vary from aggressive treatment strategies that incorporate multi-agent induction chemotherapy and consolidative transplant to less intensive treatment strategies that utilize alkylators, purine nucleoside analogues, and the monoclonal antibody rituximab. Although, higher response rates have been seen with aggressive approaches, their impact on overall survival is not yet fully appreciated and many patients are not candidates for such approaches. Thus, finding less intensive induction regimens is imperative. The combination of rituximab plus cladribine has shown activity across a number of B-cell malignancies and the NCCN treatment guidelines currently include this regimen for the initial treatment of MCL; noting that there are few data available to substantiate this recommendation. The largest prospective experience (n=29) with R-cladribine for the initial treatment of MCL comes from the North Central Cancer Group. They reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 66% with a 52% complete remission (CR) rate and a 2 year progression free survival (PFS) of 43%. Given its therapeutic potential and increasing popularity, more data are needed to verify the benefits of the R-cladribine regimen. Therefore, to explore the role of R-cladribine in the treatment of newly diagnosed MCL, we performed a retrospective chart review of patients with newly diagnosed MCL treated with R-cladribine. Methods: We reviewed the charts of 31 patients with newly diagnosed MCL initially seen at two university hospitals and at an associated VA that were treated with R-cladribine. One patient had been previously treated with 2 cycles of R-CHOP;, all other patients were untreated. All patients had measurable disease and follow up imaging (CT and/or PET/CT scans) before and at the completion of therapy. Post treatment bone marrow biopsies were not available for all patients. Chemotherapy included: cladribine 5mg/m2 given over two hours on days 1–5; and rituximab given on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 with the first cycle and then on day 1 with subsequent cycles. Each cycle was 28 days for up to a total of 6 cycles. Patients with an initial response received maintenance rituximab. Results: The median age of our cohort was 67 years (48-86) with 42% of patients ≥ 65 years. All patients had advanced stage disease (stage ≥ 3) and the majority of patients had poor risk disease. For example, 20/31 (65%) of patients had high FLIPI (≥ 3) and11/31 (37%) had high MIPI (≥ 6). Of the 24 patients in whom beta2-microglobulin was available, 11 (46%) had levels ≥ 3.5 mg/L. The overall response rate (ORR) was 87% with 19/31(61%) of patients achieving a complete remission (CR/CRu). At a median follow up of 21.5 months (2-85 months) the 2 year PFS rate is 65% and the OS rate is 74%. For those subjects achieving a CR/CRu with a median follow up of 23 months, 1/19 (5.3%) has relapsed. No significant trends were seen regarding response rate and pre-treatment disease defining parameters including Ki67, beta2-microglobulin, FLIPI, or MIPI. However, CR was associated with improved survival (p = <.0001) while high MIPI was associated with worse survival (p=0.0317). There was one toxic death (neutropenic sepsis) related to treatment. Conclusion: The combination of rituximab plus cladribine appears to be an effective initial therapy in MCL. The higher response rates seen in this series may be the result of patient selection and/or increased rituximab exposure. Rituximab maintenance may also be an important component of ongoing disease control in responding patients. These data support the ongoing evaluation of rituximab plus cladribine in combination with novel agents. Prospective single arm studies incorporating R-cladribine with other novel agents such as vorinostat, bortezomib, or temsirolimus are ongoing. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Guidelines for the investigation and management of mantle cell lymphoma

“…Other rituximab‐chemotherapy regimens with demonstrated benefit in MCL include rituximab and cladribine (Spurgeon et al , ), and rituximab and chlorambucil (Bauwens et al , ). Details of response are given in Table ; however, it is worth noting that the median age of patients in these studies was 67 and 63 years, respectively, suggesting that such regimens may be tolerated in an older patient group.…”

Efficacy and safety of frontline rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone plus bortezomib (VR-CAP) or vincristine (R-CHOP) in a subset of newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma patients medically eligible for transplantation in the randomized, phase 3 LYM-3002 study

“…The CR rate observed in our study was achieved with a fixed duration of VR-CAP treatment (4 months; 6-8 cycles) in the absence of maintenance therapy. Response rates achieved with other, less aggressive induction therapies in patients with previously untreated MCL include 31% CR with bendamustine/rituximab [15], 95% CR with bendamustine/rituximab/cytarabine [16], 52% CR and 61% CR/CRu with cladribine/rituximab [17,18] and 64% CR with lenalidomide/rituximab [19]. The data in these studies are likely to be more heavily weighted towards a population ineligible for transplant or intensive therapy for medical reasons, so it cannot be directly compared with the results observed in our study of SCT-eligible patients.…”

Guideline for the management of mantle cell lymphoma

“…Other reported regimens for elderly patients include rituximab combined with chlorambucil (Bauwens et al , ; Sachanas et al , ) or cladribine (Spurgeon et al , ) with overall response rates of 60 to 90%.…”