We report the long-term outcome of a multicenter, prospective study examining fludarabine and rituximab in Waldenströ m macroglobulinemia (WM). WM patients with less than 2 prior therapies were eligible. Intended therapy consisted of 6 cycles (25 mg/m 2 per day for 5 days) of fludarabine and 8 infusions (375 mg/m 2 per week) of rituximab. A total of 43 patients were enrolled. Responses were: complete response (n ؍ 2), very good partial response (n ؍ 14), partial response (n ؍ 21), and minor response (n ؍ 4), for overall and major response rates of 95.3% and 86.0%, respectively. Median time to progression for all patients was 51.2 months and was longer for untreated patients (P ؍ .017) and those achieving at least a very good partial response (P ؍ .049). Grade 3 or higher toxicities included neutropenia (n ؍ 27), thrombocytopenia (n ؍ 7), and pneumonia (n ؍ 6), including 2 patients who died of non-Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. With a median follow-up of 40.3 months, we observed 3 cases of transformation to aggressive lymphoma and 3 cases of myelodysplastic syndrome/ acute myeloid leukemia. The results of this study demonstrate that fludarabine and rituximab are highly active in WM, although short-and long-term toxicities need to be carefully weighed against other available treatment options. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00020800.
IntroductionWaldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a distinct B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder characterized primarily by bone marrow infiltration with lymphoplasmacytic cells, along with demonstration of an immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathy. [1][2][3] Among treatment options for patients with WM, nucleoside analogs, as well as the CD20-directed monoclonal antibody rituximab, have been commonly used. Response rates of 30% to 70% and durations of response of 20 to 24 months have been reported with the use of nucleoside analogs in WM patients. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Importantly, similar response rates were reported in these studies whether nucleoside analogs were used as first line or salvage therapy. The use of rituximab has also been extensively evaluated in patients with WM. Using standard dose (ie, 4 weekly infusions at 375 mg/m 2 ), overall response rates of 25% to 30% have been observed. More recently, an extended dose regimen giving rituximab at 375 mg/m 2 per week for 4 weeks, then repeated again at week 12, has resulted in higher (40%-50%) overall response rates. 4,[14][15][16][17][18][19] In preclinical studies, the potential for rituximab and fludarabine to enhance each other's activity has been demonstrated and may involve a spectrum of intracellular as well as extracellular mechanisms. [20][21][22] Moreover, in other indolent B-cell malignancies, the combination of rituximab and fludarabine has led to higher response rates than those observed with either agent alone. [23][24][25][26][27] The potential for enhanced clinical benefit by giving rituximab with fludarabine concurrently vs sequentially has also bee...