2011
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201110674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cl− concentration changes and desensitization of GABAA and glycine receptors

Abstract: Desensitization of ligand-gated ion channels plays a critical role for the information transfer between neurons. The current view on γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A and glycine receptors includes significant rapid components of desensitization as well as cross-desensitization between the two receptor types. Here, we analyze the mechanism of apparent cross-desensitization between native GABAA and glycine receptors in rat central neurons and quantify to what extent the current decay in the presence of ligand is a re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
62
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
9
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these data are not in good agreement with previous studies that reported that splicing of the long insert into GlyR ␣3 mRNA impacts on desensitization kinetics (12, 39 -41). Notably, desensitization of GlyR channels may be highly variable (20,41) and influenced by many parameters, such as receptor density (42), membrane potential (43), intracellular and extracellular pH (44,45), ion concentration (46,47), the membrane lipid composition, and phosphorylation of the intracellular TM3-TM4 domain or the N-glycosylation of the receptor N terminus (20). Technical features, such as slow or fast ligand application or the ligand concentration (16,48), duration of ligand administration, or the recording mode may also account for these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these data are not in good agreement with previous studies that reported that splicing of the long insert into GlyR ␣3 mRNA impacts on desensitization kinetics (12, 39 -41). Notably, desensitization of GlyR channels may be highly variable (20,41) and influenced by many parameters, such as receptor density (42), membrane potential (43), intracellular and extracellular pH (44,45), ion concentration (46,47), the membrane lipid composition, and phosphorylation of the intracellular TM3-TM4 domain or the N-glycosylation of the receptor N terminus (20). Technical features, such as slow or fast ligand application or the ligand concentration (16,48), duration of ligand administration, or the recording mode may also account for these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were continuously (between test applications of agonists) perfused with gravity-fed extracellular solution provided by a custom-made pipette positioned 100-200 µm from the studied cell. Computer-controlled exchange to solutions containing agonist via solenoid valves occurred with a time constant of ∼50 ms, as measured by the change in offset potential on changing between high and low K + concentrations in the perfusate (Karlsson et al, 2011). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments to estimate resting Cl – conductance, which depend on estimates of [Cl – ] i but are compatible with slow Cl – equilibration with the patch pipette, were made using the quicker amphotericin B-perforated patch technique (Rae et al, 1991). Both perforated-patch techniques are compatible with rapid Cl – loading (Karlsson et al, 2011). The majority of experiments were made under voltage-clamp conditions, but a few control experiments were made under current-clamp conditions at zero current.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The superior olivary nucleus (SON) is a potential source of glycinergic input, as it has been shown to project to the LLDp in zebra finch (Wild et al, 2010), and possible SON projections to LLDp neurons in chicken have been reported (Westerberg and Schwarz, 1995). The role of glycine could be to maintain neural inhibition in the circuit if GABA is depleted (Fischl et al, 2014; Nerlich et al, 2014), or it could modulate GABAergic inhibition through cross-suppression due to changes in the Cl − driving force (Grassi, 1992; Karlsson et al, 2011) or other signaling cascades (Li et al, 2003). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%