2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Civilian Moral Injury and Amygdala Functional Connectivity During Attention to Threat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the assessment of the interpersonal versus noninterpersonal nature of PTEs would be useful in distinguishing fear-based versus moral injury pathways to psychological symptoms, while, qualitative work would provide an important avenue to explore the subjective experiences of refugees of particular events, and how these relate to moral beliefs, and psychological outcomes. In addition, the implementation of more objective or controlled methods to measure moral injury-related sequelae (e.g., using neural, implicit and/or experimental methods or measures; Andrews et al, 2023; Fulton et al, 2024; Hoffman & Nickerson, 2022a, 2022b) represents an important future direction to overcome measurement-related limitations in the field to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the assessment of the interpersonal versus noninterpersonal nature of PTEs would be useful in distinguishing fear-based versus moral injury pathways to psychological symptoms, while, qualitative work would provide an important avenue to explore the subjective experiences of refugees of particular events, and how these relate to moral beliefs, and psychological outcomes. In addition, the implementation of more objective or controlled methods to measure moral injury-related sequelae (e.g., using neural, implicit and/or experimental methods or measures; Andrews et al, 2023; Fulton et al, 2024; Hoffman & Nickerson, 2022a, 2022b) represents an important future direction to overcome measurement-related limitations in the field to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%