Civil society participation in REDD+ and FLEGT processes: Case study analysis from Cameroon, Ghana, Liberia and the Republic of Congo

Abstract

REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) and FLEGT (Forest LawEnforcement, Governance and Trade) are two initiatives with roots at an international scale that aim to influence national and local level forest governance. This paper looks to understand how the breadth and depth of participation of different types of actors, most particularly civil society, compares between these initiatives and in what ways the structure of the governance arrangement and/or the focus of commodities may influence this participation. The paper presents findings from an assessment study on the dynamics of participation of civil society actors in REDD+ and FLEGT processes in four countries of Central and Western Africa: Cameroon, Ghana, Liberia and the Republic of Congo. Building on key civil society participation literature, a questionnaire tool was developed and applied in these countries. The analysis is drawn from interviews based on the questionnaire tool, some in-depth interviews and secondary research. The study finds that there is a growing recognition of civil society participation in national policy making of forest governance in the four countries, and a majority of the civil society organisations are participating in REDD+ and FLEGT processes. The quality and degree of their participation (that can range from informing to empowering) however, varies between FLEGT and REDD+ (i.e. FLEGT being more accommodative than REDD+), among a diversity of these actors and the studied countries. The difference in participation between REDD+ and FLEGT is related to the design of these two processes, the general lack of time and financial investment and the technical nature of REDD+ consultations. Moreover, FLEGT has been more inclusive and participatory right from the beginning whereas participatory spaces are generally lacking in REDD+ process, most particularly in its initial stages. As REDD+ and FLEGT processes are being consolidated in these countries and worldwide, this paper provides several avenues of interventions needed to address gaps on participation, such as strengthening participatory platforms, addressing representation deficit for community groups and focusing on capacity building of civil society actors.

Community Participation in Mahikeng Local Municipality: Power Relations Perspective

“…The power imbalance with respect to decision making in local governance matters in the African development context has been observed by scholars such as Makuwira (2018); Nantongo et al (2019); Satyal (2018) and Denney et al (2018). In a similar manner, Williams (2007) argued that local power dynamics are concealed by accepting too easily what is termed a community, without critically exploring it, such that the conceptualisation and practice of community participation becomes clear.…”

REDD+ policy implementation and institutional interplay: Evidence from three pilot projects in Cameroon

“…Policy conflict hinders participation; it is thus unsurprising that limited involvement has been reported in various REDD+ initiatives. In Cameroon, local communities, indigenous people, small forest enterprises, and people from specific ecological zones such as the savanna, are often poorly involved in REDD+ processes (Tegegne et al 2017, Satyal 2018.…”

The Role of the Government in Increasing Community Welfare in Pohuwato Regency

“…Increasing people's welfare certainly requires a long process, and of course must understand and pay attention to the habits and way of life of these communities (Han & Gao, 2019;Harrikari, 2014;Lwin, Fallon, Trocmé, Fluke, & Mishna, 2018;Mersky, Topitzes, & Blair, 2017). In improving the welfare of rural communities it must indeed be made aware of and taken into account by the village government, and also by the community itself so as to enable the growth of self-reliance or community participation in the process of implementation (Ang, 2019;Jaeger, Röjvik, & Berglund, 2015;Salemink & Strijker, 2018;Satyal, 2018) Regional autonomy has become a new hope for the government and village communities to build their villages according to the needs and aspirations of the community. for most village government officials, autonomy is a new opportunity that can open space for creativity for village officials in managing the village (Daraba, 2017;Daraba, Ramli, Sakawati, & Salam, 2018;Nawir, Maulana, Nuryamin, & Husain, n.d.;M.…”