Civil Society and Its Institutional Context in CEE

Abstract

Although civil societies in Central and Eastern Europe are often portrayed as similar, united by a shared communist past, they have developed along increasingly divergent trajectories over the past three decades. This article investigates the current state of civil society in the region and the role the institutional context plays in it. Drawing on historical institutionalism and the process of European integration, we classify the 14 countries under investigation into three distinct groups and analyze data from a survey of more than 350 local civil society experts. We find that, together with domestic governments, international donors and the EU are perceived as the most influential institutional actors for civil society organizations. Their respective influences, however, depend largely on a country's stage in the EU accession process. Overall, the study provides a differentiated mapping of civil society in this region and a better understanding of how the institutional context relates to a country's civil society.

Experience of Civil Government of Russian Federation Subjects with Institutions of Civil Society in the Sphere of Corruption Counteraction

“…Such a measure, as conceived by its initiators, was supposed to increase the transparency of government body activities, create new forms of public control and thereby put forward additional barriers to corruption. In other words, the Russian state has already taken systemic measures that are still being discussed or proposed by scholars in other countries [11,12]. Therefore, the attempts to teach Russia [13,14,15] to structure its legal system properly look at least ridiculous.…”

Embedding Social Innovation and Service Learning in Higher Education's Third Sector Policy Developments in Austria

“…Austria's community of practice tends to be defined by scattered practice-a fact also true for other European countries, in which we discern "different levels of maturity and mainstreaming" of service learning (Aramburuzabala et al, 2019, p. 5). In post-communist countries, we observe a dynamic growth of the Third Sector and in parallel a continuing weakness of civic society, which may lead to barriers in the implementation of service learning (Meyer et al, 2019). In Western European countries, we see a stronger democratic culture that encourages students and faculty to actively participate in the community.…”

A szolidaritási mező – járvány idején

“…Az EU-csatlakozást követően a nemzetközi források aránya csökkent és a nemzetállami aktorok váltak meghatározóvá, saját szempontjaikat érvényesítve. A demokratizálódást és az inkluzív szolidaritást hirdető szervezeteket nem ritkán a nemzeti autonómiát veszélyeztető illegitim politikai erőként bélyegezték meg -különösen az újnacionalista, populista kormányok (Meyer et al 2020).…”