1997
DOI: 10.2307/448914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Civil Rights Roll-Call Voting in the House of Representatives, 1957-1991: A Systematic Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Merle Black (1978, p. 440) shows a transformation of White support for civil rights in the South from 1957 to 1975. In analyses of civil rights roll-call votes by nonsouthern Whites, Francine Sanders (1997) finds that support varies by the perceived costs of the bill to nonsouthern Whites. She also finds that the changing public mood or general ideology of the country has little influence on support for civil rights among Republicans in Congress, but does influence the support for civil rights among nonsouthern Democrats.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Merle Black (1978, p. 440) shows a transformation of White support for civil rights in the South from 1957 to 1975. In analyses of civil rights roll-call votes by nonsouthern Whites, Francine Sanders (1997) finds that support varies by the perceived costs of the bill to nonsouthern Whites. She also finds that the changing public mood or general ideology of the country has little influence on support for civil rights among Republicans in Congress, but does influence the support for civil rights among nonsouthern Democrats.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Democratic theorists have also noted the value of debate (see Lynn Sanders 1997 for an exception). Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson (1996) provide four reasons for valuing debate: (1) debate provides more legitimacy to outcomes; (2) it gets participants to consider viewpoints different from their own; (3) it helps define the scope of the disagreement, which may help resolve conflicts; and (4) it also increases the chances of reaching reasonable policy outcomes.…”
Section: House Floor Debatementioning
confidence: 99%