Civil Engineering Quality Assessment in Terms of Construction Safety Index

Baiburin, A Kh

doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.554

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The use of standard personal safety equipment such as helmets, safety shoes and wearpacks will have a positive impact on the sustainability of construction workers and their working mentality (Senouci et al, 2015). In construction it is not only related to construction materials but also high-weight objects (Baiburin, 2017) and fire (Q. Wang & Zhang, 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Occupational Health and Safety Animated Learning Videos: Validity and Feasibility

Arthur

Anisah

Wijayanti

et al. 2021

j. pendidik. indonesia.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to produce animation learning media on OHS courses with the help of software. This research uses Lee & Owens development research model. This research is done through 5 stages, namely assessment or analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation. This research uses questionnaires to test the feasibility of learning media products through the validation of material experts and media experts. Assessments from students using scale instruments designed for validation of experts, materials, students, and construction skilled workers. Learning media products in the form of five animated videos. The rating by media experts of 87.13% is considered highly feasible. The assessment by the material expert scored at 81.43 which is categorized as very feasible. Assessments by students through limited trials scored 85, 86% of which were categorized as highly feasible. Assessments by construction skilled workers through limited trials get a value of 87% which is also categorized as highly feasible.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Occupational Health and Safety Animated Learning Videos: Validity and Feasibility

Arthur

Anisah

Wijayanti

et al. 2021

j. pendidik. indonesia.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Analysis of scientific research [53][54][55] and our own developments indicated that construction quality is assessed against six basic criteria (Figure 1): Q 1 -purpose (strength, rigidity for load-bearing structures, tightness, for waterproofing coatings, thermal conductivity for thermal insulation, etc. ); Q 2 -constructability (geometric dimensions, shape, composition, and structure); Q 3 -reliability (probability of failure, resistance to corrosion, and service life); Q 4 -maintainability (duration, labor intensity, and cost of recovery in the case of failure); Q 5 -operational safety (danger to human life and health during operation, and compliance with fire, sanitary, and environmental standards); and Q 6 -esthetics (design, appearance, and quality of surfaces).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Decision Support System for Organizing Quality Control of Buildings Construction during the Rebuilding of Destroyed Cities

Lapidus,

Makarov,

Kozlova

2023

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Natural disasters and warfare lead to the destruction of city buildings and infrastructure, leaving large numbers of people homeless. The rebuilding of destroyed cities needs to be carried out promptly while maintaining a balance between construction quality and duration. Rework due to defects and the lengthy approval of non-conformances significantly increases the duration of construction. This study aimed to develop a decision support system to fix or negotiate strategies to address construction defects, depending on their level of risk. The paper addresses the following objectives: classifying defects by the quality of construction that they affect; building a tree of construction defect risks; and developing an artificial neural network (ANN) to assess the defect risk. The weights of the links are represented by posterior probabilities of damage calculated using the Bayes’ theorem in the pre-training stage. The ANN has been adapted to cast-in-place reinforced concrete structures. When training the resulting ANN on a sample of precedents, the test sample demonstrated convergence and low errors. The resulting model will accelerate construction by automating assessments of defect severity and reducing the time spent on reworking defects with low quality risk.

show abstract

“…Baiburin [21] stated that aspects included in systematic evaluation are quality systemlevel metrics, the absence of defects, the stability of engineering procedures, and building safety indexes. Calculation formulas were provided for statistical values considering the type of parameter distribution.…”

Section: Previous Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Holistic Framework for Assessing the Quality of Building Construction in Saudi Arabia

Alfalah,

Alasaibia,

Alshamrani

et al. 2023

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to make sure that structures adhere to the necessary norms and laws, it is essential to evaluate the quality of building construction. According to several frameworks, the quality of a building’s construction can be assessed in a number of different circumstances. In order to provide building projects with excellent quality and competitive pricing, hard work is required. To raise the standard of building construction, a model was created. The goal of this project is to provide a model for raising building construction quality. This study used the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) technique, which includes the determination of consistency ratios, pairwise comparisons, normalization, and a comparison matrix. The difficulty of implementing quality was determined for each task using the AHP technique. This was multiplied by the quality factor to obtain the final quality level. The model was tested in three different situations, and it was discovered that quality application is challenging across all building operations. Using a quality evaluation technique, this study assessed the building construction quality in Saudi Arabia. Additionally, a pairwise comparison, normalization, and a comparison matrix were used to calculate the consistency ratio. The ultimate quality level was determined by multiplying the difficulty level for each activity, as determined using the AHP approach, by the quality factor. This study will therefore be helpful to those involved in Saudi Arabian building, including architects, engineers, quality experts, and others. Additionally, the tool aids in the decision making process for enhancing construction quality.

show abstract

Civil Engineering Quality Assessment in Terms of Construction Safety Index

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Occupational Health and Safety Animated Learning Videos: Validity and Feasibility

Occupational Health and Safety Animated Learning Videos: Validity and Feasibility

A Decision Support System for Organizing Quality Control of Buildings Construction during the Rebuilding of Destroyed Cities

A Holistic Framework for Assessing the Quality of Building Construction in Saudi Arabia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About