2014
DOI: 10.1086/679189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Civic Action

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org..

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
122
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(28 reference statements)
3
122
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As competitive grants replaced federal transfers to municipalities, political conflict was subordinated in urban governance which, in turn, shifted political struggles to the realm of ideology rather than pragmatic engagements. Ideological terrain is far more amenable to polarization and manipulation than discussions that are grounded in the civic action of communities themselves (Harvey 1989b;Lichterman and Eliasoph 2014;Pacewicz 2016).…”
Section: Political Peripheralization and 'Community Availability'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As competitive grants replaced federal transfers to municipalities, political conflict was subordinated in urban governance which, in turn, shifted political struggles to the realm of ideology rather than pragmatic engagements. Ideological terrain is far more amenable to polarization and manipulation than discussions that are grounded in the civic action of communities themselves (Harvey 1989b;Lichterman and Eliasoph 2014;Pacewicz 2016).…”
Section: Political Peripheralization and 'Community Availability'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Civic action, defi ned by Lichterman and Eliasoph (2014), refers not only to activities taking place in the civic sphere, and thus allows for a broader and more phenomenologically valid lens through which to understand social change: "considering 'civic' as a particular kind of action rather than a kind of sector-specifi c actor, a researcher can notice civic action in complex organizations that may include noncivic action as well." 2 There are engaging and informative discussions of the relative drawbacks and merits of the so-called "citizen-consumer" that are beyond the scope of this chapter.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonprofit organizations are actors in different strategic action fields (Fligstein and McAdam 2011), and though civic action can take place in many different settings (Lichterman and Eliasoph 2014), some fields provide much more space to pursue a civil society logic (see also Seibel in this issue) than others. The Norwegian study shows that a stronger presence of civil society logic can emerge when municipal hierarchical administration is kept at arm's length at the same time as for-profits actors are not active in the field.…”
Section: The Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%