2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CityGML – Interoperable semantic 3D city models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
331
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 506 publications
(377 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
331
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Improvements concerning the vertical and horizontal accuracy of inundation depth estimates can be expected from using higher resolution lidar DEMs which may achieve vertical accuracies for terrain data in the range of ±15 cm (Mandlburger et al, 2009) and thus also include details about dike crests. Improvements can also be expected as a result of the integration of more detailed information about the reference environment as for instance available from 3-D-city models (Gröger et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements concerning the vertical and horizontal accuracy of inundation depth estimates can be expected from using higher resolution lidar DEMs which may achieve vertical accuracies for terrain data in the range of ±15 cm (Mandlburger et al, 2009) and thus also include details about dike crests. Improvements can also be expected as a result of the integration of more detailed information about the reference environment as for instance available from 3-D-city models (Gröger et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast with computer graphics where models are simplified to their coarser counterparts in a dynamic process. Moreover, LODs of 3D city models do not differ only by the amount of data, richness of details and visual properties, but may also define the semantics, and the complexity of buildings and other city objects required for different applications (Gröger & Plümer, 2012). While researchers recognise that there are no universally agreed LODs for 3D buildings and other objects comparably to the 2D topographic maps that have official scale series (Meng & Forberg, 2007), there is still not much work on the formalisation of LOD, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Brasebin et al [6] developed a model for the French regulations for local urban planning (Plan Local d'Urbanisme). Their model is based on CityGML (an open standard for 3D city models developed by the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) [7][8][9]), Inspire specifications for cadastral parcel [10], and COVADIS (a French standard, compliant with Inspire specifications for Land Use [11]). …”
Section: Formalisation Of the Detailed Development Plansmentioning
confidence: 99%