Climbing and Walking Robots: Towards New Applications 2007
DOI: 10.5772/5090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

City-Climber: A New Generation Wall-Climbing Robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Total adsorption force of the robot P Absorption force of the sealing chamber P 1 Absorption force of the upper sealing chamber P 2 Absorption force of the down sealing chamber P 3 Absorption force of the sealing chamber N S Supportiveness of the sealing structure N W Supportiveness of the wheels f S Friction of the sealing chamber f w…”
Section: Mass Of the Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Total adsorption force of the robot P Absorption force of the sealing chamber P 1 Absorption force of the upper sealing chamber P 2 Absorption force of the down sealing chamber P 3 Absorption force of the sealing chamber N S Supportiveness of the sealing structure N W Supportiveness of the wheels f S Friction of the sealing chamber f w…”
Section: Mass Of the Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These robots, no matter wheeled or tracked, cannot work on curved surfaces or crossing obstacles on the surface (frame or groove, et al). This disadvantage has been overcome by robots with multi-chamber structure, and some typical prototypes include City-Climber [2], Alicia 3 [3,4] and CROMSCI [5][6][7], each of which has 2, 3 and 7 chambers respectively. Besides, frame structure and legged mechanism also enable a pneumatic adsorption robot to cross obstacles or grooves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a climbing robot with static air pressure can only adhere to smooth and non-porous surfaces [4,7], and ones with dynamic air flow can be heavy and noisy due to bulky air pumps or fans [8]. The magnetic adhesive force is, although strong, only available on ferromagnetic materials [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of this, the main problem with single-body robots is that they can only work on a plain surface, because grooves or obstacles on the surface may seriously damage the sealing of the suction chamber and cause the robot to fall down. In contrast, binary-body robots exhibit better obstaclecrossing and surface transit performance, such as the City-Climber series robot [2] which has more than 4kg ground adsorption power and over 4.2kg surface adsorption force. However, the mobility and agility of binary-body robots are generally worse than single-body robot due to their larger body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%