Citizenship, Community, and Recovery: A Group- and Peer-Based Intervention for Persons With Co-Occurring Disorders and Criminal Justice Histories

Rowe, Michael; Benedict, Patricia; Sells, Dave; Dinzeo, Thomas J.; Garvin, Charles; Schwab, Lesley; Baranoski, Madelon; Girard, Vincent; Bellamy, Chyrell

doi:10.1080/15560350903340874

Cited by 42 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Citizenship was first conceptualized by identifying the determinants of community inclusion among individuals with histories of incarceration and mental illness and other vulnerable populations, recognizing the need for various community resources such as employment, healthcare, housing and a sense of belonging (Rowe et al, 2009). The concept was subsequently explored through a randomized controlled trial of a citizenship intervention called the Citizens' Project and later the development of a Citizenship Measure.…”

Section: Utility For Case Managersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of the citizens measure into a tool to guide clinical practice and its utility for case managers

Bellamy

Kriegel

Barrenger

et al. 2017

American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Utility For Case Managersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of the citizens measure into a tool to guide clinical practice and its utility for case managers

Bellamy

Kriegel

Barrenger

et al. 2017

American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As noted by Rowe et al, (2009) the relationships described by participants in this study suggest a 'program' citizenship submitting that the impact of their life disruption includes a reduction in their rights and consequently in their ability to meet their responsibilities as citizens.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

“…At best, marginalised individuals may achieve a second-class or "program citizenship" characterised by a sense of community disconnection and a dependence on services for their social context (Rowe et al, 2009). Therefore, community and an individual's inclusion in their community play a central role in achieving citizenship.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Citizenship programs go beyond considering citizenship as a purely legal concept to exploring the multi-faceted aspects of being a citizen in 21 st century western societies (Rowe et al, 2009). The theoretical framework drawn upon to explore the findings from this study brings together recognition, recovery and citizenship theory (Anderson & Honneth, 2004;Rowe & Davidson, 2016), as a reflective lens to consider the experience of the program participants concentrating on the promotion of inclusion and the individual skills required to become included within the various communities to which the participants belong, enhancing their citizenship and promoting their recovery.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The model of citizenship that frames both programs is that developed by Rowe et al (2009). This model considers that citizenship is about individual and collective connections to the rights, responsibilities, roles, resources and relationships available to individuals through local and national institutions both social and political, and ecological life in their neighbourhoods and local communities (Rowe & Baranoski, 2011;O'Connell, Clayton & Rowe, 2017).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Constructing community to achieve citizenship using recognition theory, recovery, and citizenship as a reflective lens: Experiences from the United States and Scotland

Stewart

Black²,

Benedict

et al. 2017

American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Declaration of Interest:The views in this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors. The Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. FUNDINGThis project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 690954.Correspondence related to this manuscript should be sent to Ailsa Stewart: ailsa.e.stewart@strath.ac.uk Abstract:This paper explores the usefulness of recognition theory, recovery and citizenship in explaining constructions of community by adults who have experienced life disruptions participating in similar Citizenship programs in the US and Scotland. A content analysis of secondary data was undertaken and focus groups held with recent graduates of both programs. The findings indicate that constructions of community aligned significantly with aspects of identity and common experience rather than location. Moving towards an identity framed by assets rather than deficits, was further identified, which reflects the need for recognition to be extended by communities that are well informed and non-discriminatory in their attitudes towards those with life disruptions to promote inclusion and connectedness.Interventions at the level of community development and engagement are therefore crucial in promoting inclusion and increasing citizenship for marginalized groups; alongside the role of social movements and public policy in tackling stigma and discriminatory attitudes.Uniquely, within this project, a theoretical framework that combined elements of recognition theory, recovery and citizenship emerged that best explained the experience of those with life disruptions and provided direction for a future focus on community development as well as recovery and citizenship oriented practice.

show abstract

Trauma‐Informed Care for Individuals with Serious Mental Illness: An Avenue for Community Psychology's Involvement in Community Mental Health

Mihelicova

Brown

Shuman

2017

American J of Comm Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Individuals with serious mental illness are at particularly high risk for trauma; however, service environments with which they interact may not always be trauma-informed. While community mental health and other human services settings are moving toward trauma-informed care (TIC) service delivery, a variety of TIC frameworks exist without consensus regarding operationalization, thereby leading to challenges in implementation. TIC is principle-driven and presents substantial overlap with community psychology values and competencies, including ecological frameworks, second-order change, empowerment, and citizen participation. One way to address barriers to TIC implementation is to draw on the strengths of the field of community psychology. With a particular emphasis on the applicability of TIC to individuals with serious mental illness, this paper identifies key implementation issues and recommends future directions for community psychologists in clarifying the service framework, its adaptation to specific service contexts, and improving delivery through consultation and evaluation. Community psychologists may work with various disciplines involved in the TIC field to together promote a more conscious, actionable shift in service delivery.

show abstract

Citizenship, Community, and Recovery: A Group- and Peer-Based Intervention for Persons With Co-Occurring Disorders and Criminal Justice Histories

Cited by 42 publications

References 38 publications

Development of the citizens measure into a tool to guide clinical practice and its utility for case managers

Development of the citizens measure into a tool to guide clinical practice and its utility for case managers

Constructing community to achieve citizenship using recognition theory, recovery, and citizenship as a reflective lens: Experiences from the United States and Scotland

Trauma‐Informed Care for Individuals with Serious Mental Illness: An Avenue for Community Psychology's Involvement in Community Mental Health

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About