2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citizens' view of legitimacy in the context of Finnish forest policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Karppinen and Hänninen (2000), the majority of Finnish forest owners resemble American timber sellers with timber production objectives. Valkeapää and Karppinen (2013) found that forest owners considered forest policy in general to be more acceptable than other citizens did. Forest owners felt that forest policy functions more properly concerning overall legitimacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Karppinen and Hänninen (2000), the majority of Finnish forest owners resemble American timber sellers with timber production objectives. Valkeapää and Karppinen (2013) found that forest owners considered forest policy in general to be more acceptable than other citizens did. Forest owners felt that forest policy functions more properly concerning overall legitimacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, some studies have been conducted concerning differences in attitudes (Karppinen and Hänninen 2000) and the perceived legitimacy of environmental and forest policy (Valkeapää and Karppinen 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar problems are reported in ratio-scale pairwise comparisons based on other types of surveys (Sironen et al 2013), and other measures have been presented for evaluating the inconsistencies (Peláez and Lamata 2003;Ramík and Korviny 2010) and uncertainties related to the process overall (see Alho and Kangas 1997), differing from those originally proposed by Saaty (1980). According to the earlier studies on the preferences on forest use, the majority of citizens, regardless of forest ownership, do not approve of clearcutting (Valkeapää and Karppinen 2013). Also, according to pairwise comparisons of edited photographs of various forest management alternatives (Silvennoinen et al 2002;Tönnes et al 2004;Ribe 2009), the scenic values in clearcut forests are consistently lower than in forests grown in denser, uneven-aged structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, we investigated how controversial clear-cuttingbased forest management practices were perceived by respondents (see also Valkeapää and Karppinen, 2013). Based on our results, the choice of traditional clear-cutting -based forest management was seen as an appropriate regime in commercial forests by 67% of respondents.…”
Section: Forest Usage and Role Of Forest-related Activities In The Mumentioning
confidence: 98%