Citizens' perceptions of justice in international climate policy: an empirical analysis

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in AbstractRelying on a recent survey of more than 3300 participants from China, Germany and the US, this paper empirically analyzes citizens' perceptions of climate change and climate policy, focusing on key guiding principles for sharing mitigation costs across countries. The ranking of the main principles for burden-sharing is identical in China, Germany and the US: accountability followed by capability, egalitarianism, and sovereignty. Thus, on a general level, citizens across these countries seem to have a common understanding of fairness. We therefore find no evidence that citizens' (stated) fairness preferences are detrimental to future burden-sharing agreements. While there is heterogeneity in citizens' perceptions of climate change and climate policy within and across countries, a substantial portion of citizens in all countries perceive a lack of transparency, fairness, and trust in international climate agreements.

Offset carbon emissions or pay a price premium for avoiding them? A cross-country analysis of motives for climate protection activities

“…In contrast to former studies (e.g., Lange et al, 2014;Schleich et al, 2014), we regard two alternatives for making contributions to the public good climate protection which provide no additional co-benefits like financial advantages or positive health effects for the individual. We account for several psychological motives like feelings of warm glow or moral obligation, social norms, green identity, and signaling.…”

Just ETS? Social justice and recent reforms in EU and US carbon markets

“…In the "why equality"debate (Krebs 2000) egalitarianism is strongly challenged, and inviolable standards such as human dignity are proposed as alternatives. But while equality certainly cannot be considered the sole criterion for social justice, and it anyway has to be accompanied by minimum standards, preferring equality to inequality seems theoretically adequate (Ott/Döring 2004) and empirically justified (Schleich et al 2014). But even if equality is accepted, the "equality of what"-question arises.…”

“…Besides environmental effectiveness and economic efficiency, social justice plays a key role in sustainable climate policy. Social justice was a founding principle of sustainable development (WCED 1987) and recent empirical research has proven the appreciation people in different countries show for an equitable approach to climate policy (Schleich et al 2014). In addition, current energy transformation debates have raised questions on a fair burden sharing, especially because even an efficient policy mix is expected to increase overall costs (Heindl et al 2014).…”

Do Voluntary Commons Associations Deliver Sustainable Grazing Outcomes? An Empirical Study of England

“…Starting with the empirical and experimental literature on voluntary associations and agreements, results concerning their effectiveness in delivering improved environmental organisations appear inconclusive (Kotchen 2013;Schleich et al 2016;Gallier et al 2017;Kesternich et al 2017). This is partly driven by the fact that many voluntary environmental organisations have multiple objectives.…”