“…Professionalized legislatures have been associated with increased legislative efficiency (Squire 1998), more time for legislators to focus on developing legislation, deliberating on policy, and interacting with other branches (Rosenthal 1998; Squire 1988), greater policy innovation (Kousser 2005), more casework for constituents (Freeman and Richardson 1996), and greater congruence between public opinion and policy (Maestas 2000). Although scholars have generally viewed these effects positively, past studies have found a negative association between legislative professionalism and public approval of and confidence in state legislatures (Jewell 1982; Kelleher and Wolak 2007; Patterson, Ripley, and Quinlan 1992; Squire 1993). The negative relationship may be due to other outcomes associated with legislative professionalism, including that it provides incumbents with greater electoral safety (Berry, Berkman, and Schneiderman 2000), attracts more ambitious legislators (Maestas 2003), and advantages Democrats (Fiorina 1989, 1994).…”