The Science of Citizen Science 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citizen Social Science: New and Established Approaches to Participation in Social Research

Abstract: This chapter explores the ways in which the roles of citizens and researchers play out in the social sciences. This is expressed by numerous overlapping and related terms, such as co-production and participatory action research, to name but two, and by the different social topics that citizen social science draws attention to. The key question this chapter seeks to explore is what does naming citizen social science as such bring to the fields of citizen science and the social sciences? The chapter explores the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is an as-yet-vacant niche for established global citizen science platforms to improve documentation of threats (e.g., unsustainable use) to biodiversity, and of conservation responses. Furthermore, citizen social science [68] approaches offer new opportunities to account for social processes when investigating where, when, and what conservation actions should be implemented to support sustainable people-nature interactions through, for example, participation and mutual learning between stakeholders [69]. Public participation geographic information systems and citizen social science can provide an important means of collecting spatially explicit social data (e.g., about the values people associate with biodiversity, places and land-use preferences, therefore indicating their support or conflict over where conservation actions should be implemented).…”
Section: Filling Information Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is an as-yet-vacant niche for established global citizen science platforms to improve documentation of threats (e.g., unsustainable use) to biodiversity, and of conservation responses. Furthermore, citizen social science [68] approaches offer new opportunities to account for social processes when investigating where, when, and what conservation actions should be implemented to support sustainable people-nature interactions through, for example, participation and mutual learning between stakeholders [69]. Public participation geographic information systems and citizen social science can provide an important means of collecting spatially explicit social data (e.g., about the values people associate with biodiversity, places and land-use preferences, therefore indicating their support or conflict over where conservation actions should be implemented).…”
Section: Filling Information Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One factor that is weighted higher in this study is "Partnerships to achieve the goals". This has to do with the fact that many of the projects are so-called "Future Cities" ("Zukunftsstadt"), a BMBF funding program 4 for the development and implementation of sustainable spatial development concepts with a strong emphasis on citizen participation. There, mainly alliances of municipalities, business and civil society organizations have been established -hence the grouping here to this specific SDG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first stream includes works that contrast CSS primarily as a method for knowledge generation with CSS as an approach for additional objectives, such as the democratization of science, scientific quality assurance, or real experiments [4], [21]. The characteristic of social science research, namely to make complex social phenomena explicable, represents a particular contribution of interdisciplinary Citizen Science or CSS [5].…”
Section: Growing Importance Of Citizen Social Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stakeholders of science have not expanded, they have exploded. Everywhere on earth, people constantly interact with new knowledge, and when given the chance of a conducive environment, inconspicuous techies make contributions to widely used free and open-source software and hardware that elsewhere could be awarded a master's degree, high-schools command reagents and join cutting-edge drug discovery and synthetic biology research, math enthusiasts collaborate across the globe with professional mathematicians in solving some of the toughest problems, indigenous peasants document and share knowledge and biological material 2 (Albagli et al, 2015;Kothari et al, 2019), and the social sciences equally face a turn towards situated and participatory research (Albert et al, 2021). Science communication broadcasts proliferate, with massive followings, and recent US opinion polls show decent levels of trust in science, which may vary significantly across issues, but where a majority of people align with scientific standards of trust when it comes to funding sources, peer review and transparency (Funk, 2020).…”
Section: Résumémentioning
confidence: 99%