Citizen reporting of wildlife interactions can improve impact-reduction programs and support wildlife carers

Abstract

Context Wildlife can be injured or orphaned through a range of (often anthropogenic) activities, creating need for volunteer rescuers and wildlife carers, of which a substantial number is active in Australia. However, the causes and contributing factors for rescued wildlife are rarely reported, which limits development of response options to these wildlife issues. An understanding of the distribution and number of rescuers and carers in relation to injured and orphaned wildlife allows training and outreach to be targeted around specific seasonal peaks, species and causes of injury. Aims and methods We conducted an analysis of 22723 reports over 7 years to the Bonorong Wildlife Rescue Service in Tasmania, Australia, to determine the frequency of species and types of human–wildlife interaction, the report distances from the central facility, and the report distribution relative to the registered rescuer and carer networks. Key results Mammals accounted for over half of all reports, followed by birds, reptiles and invertebrates. Road trauma was the predominant cause for report, followed by orphans. Disease reports and animal attack were also common. Overall, reporting was highest in late spring and summer, but different seasonality in specific causes and species suggests that targeted response options are needed at different times of year. Areas with higher reporting relative to the number of registered rescuers and carers show where volunteer recruitment can be focussed. Conclusions We used a wildlife reporting dataset to illustrate trends (such as seasonality and species vulnerability) and causes of human–wildlife interaction to inform potential response options. Implications Continued citizen reporting can assist wildlife managers to allocate resources, plan training or recruit additional volunteers, track emerging issues, such as disease and climate-related stressors, and guide the planning of public education and mitigation initiatives, particularly for human-related wildlife issues.

Online media reveals a global problem of discarded containers as deadly traps for animals

“…the rescue of venomous snakes or dangerous predators). This corresponds with the high level of involvement of volunteers in wildlife rescue 67 and confirms that they have empathy toward animals 68 . Sometimes the materials shared in social media were noticed by journalists from information portals and, as a result, they reached wider audience, helping to raise public awareness of how discarded debris in the environment can affect animals.…”

COVID-19 restrictions provide a brief respite from the wildlife roadkill toll

“…Even if roadkill is not causing population declines, roadkill should be reduced where possible from an animal welfare standpoint because collisions with cars often don't result in instantaneous death and dependent young of marsupials cannot sustain themselves if their mothers are road-killed. Road trauma was the predominant cause for reporting either injured or orphaned animals to a wildlife rescue service within Tasmania, with brushtail possums, red-necked wallabies and rufous-bellied pademelons the most frequently reported species ( Heathcote et al 2019 ).…”

We need to worry about Bella and Charlie: the impacts of pet cats on Australian wildlife

“…The predation rates for both the ringtails and the Adelaide birds seem high, and a population viability analysis would help interpret the impacts of this predation on long-term viability. Similarly, attacks by pet cats are one of the most common causes of injury to animals brought to wildlife rescue centres, along with vehicle strike and dog attack, and the cat attacks tend to be concentrated on smaller species of mammal, reptile and bird (Shine and Koenig 2001;Koenig et al 2002;Heathcote et al 2019). However, inferring impact from these studies is challenging, partly because the population sizes of the affected species are unknown, and also because of strong biases in the sorts of animals that people attempt to rescue (towards species that people care about, are scared of, and that are large enough to be noticed).…”