2018
DOI: 10.31637/epsir.18-2.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citizen Perception of Open Data and Innovation in Mexico

Abstract: This paper analyses the environment of open data and its perception by Mexicans based on the National Survey on Access to Public Information and Protection of Personal Data (ENAID) 2016 and the Survey on Public Perception of Science and Technology (ENPECYT) 2015. The literature review was focused on the open data age represents a new social paradigm that has revolutionized the way that people and organizations obtain, analyze and use large amounts of information to make decisions. Mexico has mechanisms and pla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distrust with the data collection process was an issue that we tried to address by providing additional details in the advertisement; nonetheless, such skepticism could not be avoided entirely. Mistrust toward institutions and data collection processes is a common theme in Mexico ( Vargas-Hernández and Estrada Zamora, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distrust with the data collection process was an issue that we tried to address by providing additional details in the advertisement; nonetheless, such skepticism could not be avoided entirely. Mistrust toward institutions and data collection processes is a common theme in Mexico ( Vargas-Hernández and Estrada Zamora, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach aligns with standard practices in online data collection, acknowledging the common reluctance of individuals to provide precise personal information [84]. Additionally, this procedure was incorporated due to the documented mistrust that Mexicans have toward institutions and online data collection methods [85]. The ethical standards of this study were approved by the University of Melbourne's Psychology Health and Applied Sciences Human Ethics Sub-Committee (2056618) on May 8, 2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%