Citizen involvement in co-producing decentralised stormwater systems in Brussels

Abstract

Co-production initiatives rely on citizens' contributions to create better public services. Although the existing literature has frequently focused on citizens' motivations to join co-production activities, few studies have investigated how and why citizen involvement might change during the co-production process. The article offers new insights about engagement in co-production by analysing a design initiative in Brussels, Ilot d'eau. Throughout the initiative, the four citizen collectives elaborated a specific decentralised stormwater system project that would be shared among the respective households. Even though each collective followed the same methodology, only two of the four projects reached the coconstruction phase. The paper reveals how changes in citizen involvement in the process are impacted by the methodologies of interaction used and the citizens' previous experiences in co-production. Furthermore, by examining the premature withdrawal of two of the four collectives from the initiative, the study shows why some of the changes occurred. In particular, the ambivalent role played by the local municipality during the development of the initiative together with the mediation of the organising team emerge as key determinants influencing citizen involvement.

Stormwater management in transition in Brussels-Capital Region

“…The practical results of the initiativethe construction of a common rainwater tank between two households and the creation of new green spaces at the limit between the facades and the public spaceindicated the capacity of private spaces to contribute to an alternative management of stormwater. However, the struggles of realising the projects proposed by the inhabitants revealed the low capacity of the municipality to coordinate water-related project and the lack of economic incentives to implement common projects in private spaces (Dobre et al, 2019).…”

Reclaiming site analysis from co-sensing to co-ideation: A collective cartography strategy and tactical trajectories

“…Sanders and Stappers 1 define co-design as a specific instance of co-creation within collaborative efforts throughout the design process. The term “co-ness” is widely used in literature, exemplified by practices such as co-crafting the social 2 co-constructing stories, 3 co-production of public services, 4 co-decision making, co-management, co-implementation, and others practices.…”