2016
DOI: 10.1177/0265813516638340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cities as nuclei of sustainability?

Abstract: We have assembled CO2 emission figures from collections of urban GHG emission estimates published in peer reviewed journals or reports from research institutes and non-governmental organizations. Analyzing the scaling with population size we find that the exponent is development dependent with a transition from super- to sub-linear scaling. From the climate change mitigation point of view, the results suggest that urbanization is desirable in developed countries and should be avoided in developing ones. Furthe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
36
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(100 reference statements)
8
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, emissions of these pollutants show an 'economy of scale/parsimony with scale', where 'scale' is measured by the settlement population and both emissions and population are aggregated within contiguous developed land use areas (see SI). This is broadly in line with previous results for CO 2 emissions for cities in developed countries [33]. For SO 2 , the sublinear relationship was statistically weaker (r 2 <0.6) (see section 2, and SI table S1, for details).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…That is, emissions of these pollutants show an 'economy of scale/parsimony with scale', where 'scale' is measured by the settlement population and both emissions and population are aggregated within contiguous developed land use areas (see SI). This is broadly in line with previous results for CO 2 emissions for cities in developed countries [33]. For SO 2 , the sublinear relationship was statistically weaker (r 2 <0.6) (see section 2, and SI table S1, for details).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This uncertainty is reinforced by other studies reporting either linear [91] or superlinear [92] values of the exponent governing the scaling of the total CO 2 . Furthermore, depends on additional factors and in particular decreases with the GDP per capita of the country a city belongs to [93]. In addition, a recent study of French cities suggested a parabolic behavior of CO 2 emissions versus population, implying the existence of a threshold above which a larger population leads to smaller emissions [94].…”
Section: Co 2 Emitted By Cars In Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este tipo de métricas como instrumento de comparación espacial, de optimización de simulaciones urbanas y de cambios de usos son de gran importancia para entender la estructura y composición de los paisajes simulados (Aguilera, 2010). 2011352,97 1993-2011-35 2030116,88 2011-2030-202 205081,31 2011-2050-334 Compacidad promedio GYRATE_MN 2011218,07 1993-2011-3 2030208,28 2011-2030-5 2050170,17 2011-2050 Forma promedio SHAPE_MN 256,52 2011-2030-251 2050718,84 2011-2050-513 Distancia promedio ENN_MN 2011282,19 1993-2011-35 2030441,59 2011-203036 2050396,18 2011-2050 Por otra parte, respecto al escalamiento urbano se puede indicar que el comportamiento sublineal de las emisiones CO 2 en el sistema de ciudades chileno se asocia a una economía de escala (Cottineau, Hatna, Arcaute y Batty, 2017), tal como sucede en las grandes ciudades de los países desarrollados como Estados Unidos, Alemania, Italia, Singapur, Bélgica, Finlandia, Japón, Francia, Suecia, Reino Unido, Holanda, Canadá, Australia, Suiza o Noruega (Rybski et al, 2016). Esto sugiere que mientras en los países en desarrollo las ciudades pequeñas son más eficientes en la emisión de CO 2 , en los países desarrollados es el caso de las grandes metrópolis (Rybski et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…La tendencia identificada se podría estimar como un rasgo positivo para la sostenibilidad urbana, en términos de volúmenes brutos emitidos (>4,3 millones de toneladas/año en el caso de Santiago), sin embargo es necesario mencionar que las relaciones de escalamiento dependen fuertemente de la definición de los límites de las ciudades (Arcaute et al, 2014;Louf & Barthelemy, 2014). Las unidades funcionales o morfológicas pueden influir en los exponentes resultantes, por lo que no se puede excluir un sesgo si los países en desarrollo utilizan sistemáticamente definiciones diferentes (Rybski et al, 2016). Esta diferencia también se puede aplicar por las distintas definiciones de lo urbano que realizan las instituciones públicas en Chile, por ejemplo, MINVU, INE, Municipios.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified