Cities and their hinterlands 10 years on: Local and regional governance still under debate

Abstract

This paper reviews changes over the last 10 years in the governance arrangements and processes involved in sub-national economic development and cross-boundary collaboration. It begins with a summary of the institutional changes in the main countries of the UK, in the dual context of fiscal retrenchment and neo-liberal deregulation. The picture that emerges is one of a confused patchwork in England; incremental modifications in Scotland; and embryonic developments in Wales. This is then contrasted with a range of experiences in other countries, involving wholesale recentralisation and a sidelining of local and regional institutions at one end of the spectrum, to resistance to restructuring through repurposing, increased mutual collaboration and improved management at the other. However, enhanced economic links and benefits do not automatically flow from any particular form of rescaled governance arrangements. As our original article found, the key ingredients are robust and inclusive political and decision-making processes, a suite of appropriate policy instruments and deployment of sufficient resources to ensure that they have an effect. The paper also concludes that a more comprehensive theoretical framework is needed to advance understanding of what lies behind different forms of state governance rescaling, and what makes a given instance more (or less) effective than another.

Path Clearing, Policy Acceleration or Trend Reinforcement: Potential Implications of Selected Local Government Responses to Covid-19 in the UK

“…In England, this falls instead to a specific Central Government department (currently the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities). At the same time, local government entities have been restructured in different ways, with the wholesale introduction of unitary councils in the devolved nations but partial and episodic moves in the same direction in England (Goodwin et al, 2005;Gore, 2018). This divergence has been reflected by a stronger emphasis on central-local collaboration and participatory and deliberative approaches to governance in Scotland and Wales, compared with more transactional and conflictual interactions in England (Hay & Martin, 2014;Pike et al, 2016;Verhoeven et al, 2022;Bynner et al, 2023).…”

Local Government Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK: A Thematic Review

“…Created by the Coalition government in 2011 as replacement for New Labour's regional governance infrastructure, these brought together a range of public and private sector organisations (including local authorities) to act as the main vehicle for planning and implementing sub-national economic development. In essence they grew out of the burgeoning emphasis on the city region scale as a 'functional economic geography', yet in this case transferred to disparate spatial contexts such as county council areas and motorway 'corridors' (Gore, 2018). Originally local authorities could align themselves with more than one LEP area, but more recent rationalisation abolished this possibility, so that there now exist 38 self-contained LEP sub-regions covering the whole of England.…”

Journeyscapes: the regional scale of women’s domestic violence journeys

“…Local commissioning processes create greater local differentiation, at the same time as it can be politically expedient to bemoan a 'postcode lottery' (DAC, 2021). It is clear that the geographical scale of service provision is often not evidence-based, in terms of what is properly local and at what scale (Clarke, 2013;Gore, 2018). National Government currently only provides guidance to support local commissioning (Home Office, 2016) rather than justifying or evidencing why such commissioning should be only local in the first place.…”