2000
DOI: 10.1038/35024218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citation figures suggest that the UK brain drain is a genuine problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For studies focusing specifically on the phenomenon of scientific mobility (see e.g. : [PIERSON & COTGREAVE, 2000;MAHROUM, 2000;LAUDEL, 2003;MOGEROU, 2006]). …”
Section: Tracking the Mobility Of Researchersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For studies focusing specifically on the phenomenon of scientific mobility (see e.g. : [PIERSON & COTGREAVE, 2000;MAHROUM, 2000;LAUDEL, 2003;MOGEROU, 2006]). …”
Section: Tracking the Mobility Of Researchersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… This is somewhat against the spirit of, for example, Pierson and Cotgreave (2000), who focus, arguably a little strangely, on citations per paper rather than on total citations (their data show that stayers write more papers than movers but the authors do not discuss this fact). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of bibliometric data allows conducting a comparative study of the publication activity of "mobile" and "non-mobile" authors [31], as well as studying the impact of migration on the development of various disciplines [32]. The affiliation method also allows studying the mobility of certain groups of (elite) scientists who are few in number, but who are important for the development of science [33].…”
Section: Theoretical Framementioning
confidence: 99%