Citation databases and researcher identifiers

Yakimchik, A. I.

doi:10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v42i3.2020.204703

Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal

2020

DOI: 10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v42i3.2020.204703

|View full text |Cite

Citation databases and researcher identifiers

A. I. Yakimchik

Abstract: Введение. Одной из основных тенденций, характерных для нашего времени, является интенсивное развитие информационных технологий и повсеместное их применение в различных сферах деятельности человека. Применительно к поиску и анализу научных публикаций указанная тенденция привела к качественным и, в каком-то смысле, революционным изменениям. Так, в предыдущие годы многие месяцы уходили на работу в каталогах и ксероко-УДК 025.4.03

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Typical mistakes by Russian researchers when registering and completing their ORCID records: Analysis of real cases

Loskutova¹

2022

Naučnyj redaktor i izdatelʹ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Integration of Russian science into the world’s scientific community is an important task for the government, universities, research organizations, and researchers. The ORCID identifier (iD) is an efficient tool for promoting researchers and their works, building researchers’ personal brands and enhancing their reputation in the scientific community, as well as attributing authorship. Modern journals are increasingly requiring their contributors to provide an ORCID iD as a mandatory element of the author’s information. Russian researchers, possibly due to the low awareness about the benefits of ORCID, make some typical mistakes when registering and completing their ORCID records. This article provides a brief analysis of such mistakes and shows 1) how to correctly present a researcher’s published (preferred) name and how to indicate other names the researcher is known by; 2) what visibility modes ORCID provides to its users; 3) what data can be added to a researcher’s ORCID iD for improved discoverability and recognition. An example of a published article with a wrong ORCID iD is presented; all the resulting negative outcomes for the journal are discussed. The conclusion is made about the need to raise the awareness among the research community about the importance of full and correct ORCID profiles. Editors of scientific journals should ensure that the authors’ ORCID records are filled out correctly.

show abstract

Typical mistakes by Russian researchers when registering and completing their ORCID records: Analysis of real cases

Loskutova¹

2022

Naučnyj redaktor i izdatelʹ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparative analysis of domestic psychologists and ergonomists’ publication activity using citation indices

Spasennikov

2021

Ergodesign

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The advantages and disadvantages of indices for assessing scientists’ activities using the scientometric databases Web of Science (USA), Scopus (EU) and RSCI (RF) are considered. It is proposed to use such indicators as the citation index and the publication relevance index to objectify the data in addition to the known indicators, namely the number of publications, the number of links, the average number of citations per publication, the Hirsch index. It is shown that the main disadvantage of the h-index proposed by the American physicist Jorge Hirsch for assessing ergonomists’ scientific activities is not taking into account the relevance of breakthrough scientific results and inventions. The rating of 25 leading domestic psychologists and 25 domestic ergonomists is given, which is obtained from the RSCI database and it includes such indicators as the number of publications, the total number of citations, the average number of citations, the average number of citations per publication, and the Hirsch index. It is concluded that using relevance and citation indices is, to a certain extent, evidence of this scholar’ official recognition by the scientific community and the formal confirmation of his authority. It is shown that applying scientometric citation indices and their correct use in assessing scientists’ activities should be carried out by the qualified experts in the relevant field of knowledge.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Citation databases and researcher identifiers

Cited by 2 publications

References 15 publications

Typical mistakes by Russian researchers when registering and completing their ORCID records: Analysis of real cases

Typical mistakes by Russian researchers when registering and completing their ORCID records: Analysis of real cases

Comparative analysis of domestic psychologists and ergonomists’ publication activity using citation indices

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About