Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories

Maričić, Siniša; Spaventi, Jagoda; Pavičić, Leo; Pifat-Mrzlijak, Greta

doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(19980501)49:6<530::aid-asi5>3.0.co;2-u

Cited by 16 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is important to note that these early studies of syntactic CCA were conducted manually on small paper sets. Later, however, Maričić, Spaventi, Pavičić, and Pifat‐Mrzljak () conducted a citation analysis based on the location of references in more than 350 papers. Their results showed that the methods, results, and discussion sections contain more meaningful citations than the introduction section.…”

Section: Theoretical Foundationsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Content‐based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis

Ding

Guo

Chambers

et al. 2014

Asso for Info Science & Tech

190

132

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditional citation analysis has been widely applied to detect patterns of scientific collaboration, map the landscapes of scholarly disciplines, assess the impact of research outputs, and observe knowledge transfer across domains. It is, however, limited, as it assumes all citations are of similar value and weights each equally. Content‐based citation analysis (CCA) addresses a citation's value by interpreting each one based on its context at both the syntactic and semantic levels. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of CAA research in terms of its theoretical foundations, methodical approaches, and example applications. In addition, we highlight how increased computational capabilities and publicly available full‐text resources have opened this area of research to vast possibilities, which enable deeper citation analysis, more accurate citation prediction, and increased knowledge discovery.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Foundationsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Content‐based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis

Ding

Guo

Chambers

et al. 2014

Asso for Info Science & Tech

190

132

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The use of citation frequency as an indicator of influence is legitimate. It provides a measure of the past or present influence of earlier work (Boyack and Borner, 2003; Garfield, 1985; Maricic et al., 1998). All in all, citation frequencies are assumed to indicate the scientific utility of any paper, and this can be used in turn as a partial indicator of the study quality.…”

Section: Co‐authorship In the Field Of Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Co‐Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis*

Acedo¹,

Barroso

Casanueva

et al. 2006

J Management Studies

576

396

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent decades there has been growing interest in the nature and scale of scientific collaboration. Studies into co-authorship have taken two different approaches. The first one attempts to analyse the reasons why authors collaborate and the consequences of such decision (Laband and Tollison, 2000). The second approach is based on the idea that co-authorship creates a social network of researchers (Barabási et al., 2002;Moody, 2004;Newman, 2001). In this study we have carried out an exploratory analysis of co-authorships in the field of management from the two aforementioned approaches. The results obtained show a growing tendency of the co-authored papers in the field of management, similar to what can be observed in other disciplines. Our study analyses some of the underpinning factors, which have been highlighted in the literature, explaining this tendency. Thus, the progressive quantitative character of research and the influence of the collaboration on the articles' impact are enhanced. The network analysis permits the exploration of the peculiarities of the management in comparison with other fields of knowledge, as well as the existing linkages between the most central and prominent authors within this discipline.

show abstract

“…The first results of such content-based syntactic analysis were published by Voos and Dagaev (1976), showing that it is possible to use the location of the cited article as indicator of its value for the author of the citing publication. Maričić et al (1998) ranked highest the citations in the methods or results section, followed by citations in discussion and finally in introduction. In another study, Herlach (1978) concluded that the repeated mention of a given reference in the same research paper indicated a closer relationship of the citing to the cited paper.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%