2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citation analysis of the 100 most common articles regarding distal radius fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, only a single database was used in this study. Web of Science is the most frequently used database in bibliometric studies, and most of the bibliometric softwares could identify the format from Web of Science [ 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ]. However, the drawback is that some valuable literature from other database sources are most likely missed [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, only a single database was used in this study. Web of Science is the most frequently used database in bibliometric studies, and most of the bibliometric softwares could identify the format from Web of Science [ 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ]. However, the drawback is that some valuable literature from other database sources are most likely missed [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers have come up recently in the most influential publications in the field of science,2 various medical specialties,3456789101112131415 and orthopedics in particular 161718. Soon after Lefaivre et al 16 published their article on the top 100 most-cited papers in orthopedics, numerous papers depicting the most-cited articles in different orthopedic subspecialties,1920212223242526272829303132333435 related to specific disorders36373839 and publication trends from different countries,4041424344 have appeared. Such reviews provide a useful reference for research quality and evolution of practice, areas of controversy, and future research goals in a particular field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bibliometric analysis will provide a quantitative and qualitative assessment of India's fracture research over the last three decades. Various scholars have utilized the bibliometric analysis methodology for assessing and evaluating the current status and trends of research in multiple types of fractures, including ankle (Zeng et al, 2022), calcaneus (Goedderz et al, 2022), distal radius (Grant and Chung, 2021;Jones et al, 2017), femoral neck (Peng et al, 2022), hips (Hu et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2021;Agar and Sahin, 2022), maxillofacial (Tekin and Bahsi, 2021), odontoid , olecranon (Marder et al, 2022), osteoporosis vertebral compression (Li et al, 2022), proximal humerus (Cantrell et al, 2019), Sacral (Huang et al, 2020), scaphoid (Irwin et al, 2020), spine fracture (Donally et al, 2019), and thoracolumbar fractures (Ankomah et al, 2018;Vazquez et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%