Citation analysis: A methodological review

The Citation Analyses of Scientific Publications in the Field of Educational Sciences and Teacher Education in Turkey

“…Atıf analizi; (i) bir alandaki en etkili çalışma[lar]ın (Wohlin, 2008), (ii) alandaki formal iletişim sürecinin yapısının ve seyrinin (Carr ve Britton, 2003), (iii) çalışmaların dayandığı teorilerin (Baker, 1990), (iv) bilim insanlarının bilimsel katkılarının ve kariyer başarılarının değerlendirilmesi, dergilerin nitelik ve statülerinin (Judge, Cable ve Rynes, 2007) ve (v) disiplinlerarası benzerlik ve farklılıkların (Biehl, Kim ve Wade, 2006;Hakemli Makaleler Engin Karadağ, Mikail Yalçın, Koza çiftçi, Şahin danıŞMan, nihan SölpüK, Şule toSuntaŞ, Yusuf aY Swales, 1986) belirlenmesi gibi konularda araştırmacılara önemli bilgiler sunmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, araştırmada Türkiye'de eğitim bilimleri ve öğretmen yetiştirme alanındaki yayım faaliyeti gösteren dergiler ve bu dergilerde yayınlanan makaleler atıf analizi yöntemleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir.…”

Mapping the literature of hospital pharmacy

“…One way of identifying core literature for a discipline is through bibliometric study that analyzes citation patterns in a discipline's primary literature. Citation analysis continues a longstanding tradition of mapping core literature by examining which types and ages of material are cited, in which journals cited articles appear, and where those journals are indexed [4]. This study also investigates whether citation patterns differ between high-impact, high-circulation journals and a small, national, peer-reviewed journal with a well-defined and limited geographic readership.…”

An Assessment of the Predictive Validity of Impact Factor Scores: Implications for Academic Employment Decisions in Social Work

“…Are these authors and others (e.g., Balaram, 2000) correct that we need to be concerned about the uses of the impact factor score (IFS)? There are a number of concerns regarding problems with bibliometrics in general, and the IFS in particular, that have been discussed both within and outside of social work, although these concerns have not always been empirically supported (e.g., Baker, 1990;1991;Holden: 6 paper is the use of the IFS in evaluative bibliometrics. Of course, one needs to be cautious regarding the psychometric properties of any indicator.…”