2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2021.138619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cisplatin release from inclusion complex formed by oxidized carbon nanotube: A DFT study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By decomposing the ΔΔ G ≠ into the enthalpic (ΔΔ H ≠ ) and entropic ( T ΔΔ S ≠ ) barriers, the data in Table reveal that the energetic barriers to the Pt­(II) drugs release from the CNHox are mostly enthalpic with an average entropic contribution of 34% considering all complexes. Using quantum calculations based on semirigid scan, in addition to showing a slight contribution of the entropy (∼0.1 kcal mol –1 ), De Souza et al showed that ∼95% of the free energy barrier referring to the cddp release from a CNTox prototype was composed of enthalpic contribution (ΔΔ H ≠ = 55.5 kcal mol –1 ). To determine the energetic components that govern the ΔΔ H ≠ , Figure S18 presents the profiles of the vdw and elec contributions of Δ b G for all processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By decomposing the ΔΔ G ≠ into the enthalpic (ΔΔ H ≠ ) and entropic ( T ΔΔ S ≠ ) barriers, the data in Table reveal that the energetic barriers to the Pt­(II) drugs release from the CNHox are mostly enthalpic with an average entropic contribution of 34% considering all complexes. Using quantum calculations based on semirigid scan, in addition to showing a slight contribution of the entropy (∼0.1 kcal mol –1 ), De Souza et al showed that ∼95% of the free energy barrier referring to the cddp release from a CNTox prototype was composed of enthalpic contribution (ΔΔ H ≠ = 55.5 kcal mol –1 ). To determine the energetic components that govern the ΔΔ H ≠ , Figure S18 presents the profiles of the vdw and elec contributions of Δ b G for all processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As no theoretical data refer to the release process of both cpx and oxa from the CNH, we conducted some comparisons with the literature by taking into account the cddp1@CNHox and cddp2@CNHox complexes. In this context, De Souza et al 49 obtained a value of 58.4 kcal mol −1 for the energy barrier, referring to the release event of cddp from the cavity of a CNTox model. The notable difference of 40.19 kcal mol −1 in relation to the two complexes involving cddp presented herein (see Table 5) is probably an effect of the high steric hindrance of the nanowindow (diameter of ∼4.13Å) in the CNTox prototype, which made it difficult the diffusion of this Pt(II) drug (diameter of ∼7.75 Å) through this release pathway.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The theoretical calculation of thermodynamic parameters in the solution can help experimentalists in the discussion of the spontaneity of chemical reactions and physicochemical processes as elsewhere has been reported [48,49] . To assess the thermodynamic spontaneity of the organic carbonate formation reactions, the energy parameters were calculated according to equations (8)–10: ΔEnormalF=ECarbonate-(normalEAlkoxide+normalECO2) $\vcenter{\openup.5em\halign{$\displaystyle{#}$\cr \Delta {\rm E}{_{{\rm F}}}={\rm E}{_{{\rm Carbonate}}}\hbox{-}({\rm E}{_{{\rm Alkoxide}}}+{\rm E}{_{{\rm CO2}}})\hfill\cr}}$ ΔHnormalF=ΔEnormalF+ΔHThermal $\vcenter{\openup.5em\halign{$\displaystyle{#}$\cr \Delta {\rm H}{_{{\rm F}}}=\Delta {\rm E}{_{{\rm F}}}+\Delta {\rm H}{_{{\rm Thermal}}}\hfill\cr}}$ ΔGnormalF=ΔHnormalF-TΔS $\vcenter{\openup.5em\halign{$\displaystyle{#}$\cr \Delta {\rm G}{_{{\rm F}}}=\Delta {\rm H}{_{{\rm F}}}\hbox{-}{\rm T}\Delta {\rm S}\hfill\cr}}$ …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%