2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cisplatin and gemcitabine first-line chemotherapy followed by maintenance gemcitabine or best supportive care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A phase III trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
165
2
17

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(34 reference statements)
5
165
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Along these lines, promising results were recently presented by Belani et al 7,8 suggesting that weekly paclitaxel maintenance after 6 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel may indeed prolong survival with minimal additional toxicity. Similar results were obtained by Brodowicz et al 9 with gemcitabine maintenance therapy after initial therapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Maintenance chemotherapy was feasible and produced significantly longer time to progression compared with best supportive care alone.…”
Section: Regimen and 4 Cyclessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…6 Along these lines, promising results were recently presented by Belani et al 7,8 suggesting that weekly paclitaxel maintenance after 6 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel may indeed prolong survival with minimal additional toxicity. Similar results were obtained by Brodowicz et al 9 with gemcitabine maintenance therapy after initial therapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Maintenance chemotherapy was feasible and produced significantly longer time to progression compared with best supportive care alone.…”
Section: Regimen and 4 Cyclessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, this is somewhat counterbalanced by the fact that there was a greater proportion of patients classified as ECOG performance status 0 in the current study when compared to those in the PARAMOUNT study (59% PS 0 in current study; 32% PS 0 in PARAMOUNT study). Previous studies have suggested that patients with advanced NSCLC and poor ECOG performance status gain little benefit from maintenance gemcitabine [13,14]. The current study provides evidence that increasing ECOG performance status also translates into reduced benefit from pemetrexed continuation maintenance in advanced NSCLC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Brodowicz et al showed that maintenance therapy with gemcitabine resulted in a longer median time to progression (6.6 versus 5.0 months; P < 0.001) without any significant improvement in median OS (13 versus 11 months; P = 0.195). 49 However a preplanned subgroup analysis revealed that in those with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score of greater than 80, the median survival doubled (25.3 versus 12.2 months). Gemcitabine maintenance following gemcitabine carboplatin combination reported by Belani et al was a negative trial for PFS (P 0.57) and OS (P 0.83), possibly because 66% of the patients had PS 2 and only 34% had a PS 0-1.…”
Section: -39mentioning
confidence: 99%