1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01245.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circumlocution, Communication Strategies, and The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines: An Analysis of Student Discourse

Abstract: This study was designed to analyze the use of communication (i.e., lexical repair) strategies, particularly circumlocution, by speakers at the Intermediate High and Advanced levels of oral proficiency in Spanish. All of the instances of communication strategies (CSs) used in oral proficiency interviews by 17 Intermediate High speakers and 13 Advanced speakers were analyzed to discover what strategies were favored by speakers at each level. The analysis of learner discourse found that Advanced speakers, more th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
1
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(7 reference statements)
5
42
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…No L1-based strategies were in evidence, confirming findings by Liskin-Gasparro (1996), Paribakht (1985), and Bialystok (1983) that as proficiency level increases, so too does use of L2-based strategies. Also of note, message avoidance and message abandonment were almost nonexistent.…”
Section: Specifying Status As a Nonexpertsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…No L1-based strategies were in evidence, confirming findings by Liskin-Gasparro (1996), Paribakht (1985), and Bialystok (1983) that as proficiency level increases, so too does use of L2-based strategies. Also of note, message avoidance and message abandonment were almost nonexistent.…”
Section: Specifying Status As a Nonexpertsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Studies of actual strategy use have produced opposite results, that is, learners with better proficiency used fewer strategies to convey information (Bialystok & Frohlich, 1980;Labarca & Khanji, 1986;Liskin-Gasparro, 1996;Poulisse & Schils 1989;Ting & Phan, 2008). So far, findings from studies using reported and actual strategy use have concurred on the tendency of less proficient learners to use less effective communication strategies…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early research dealt with different languages, different levels of learners, and different procedures. It has been suggested that the differences in target item, proficiency level, and learner type resulted in different CS selections (Bialystok 1983;Ito 2000;Liskin-Gasparro 1996;Poulisse 1987). Thus, different variables affect the selection of CSs.…”
Section: Communication Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%