2016
DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2016.1184292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circumcision of male infants and children as a public health measure in developed countries: A critical assessment of recent evidence

Abstract: In December of 2014, an anonymous working group under the United States' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a draft of the first-ever federal recommendations regarding male circumcision. In accordance with the American Academy of Pediatrics' circumcision policy from 2012 - but in contrast to the more recent 2015 policy from the Canadian Paediatric Society as well as prior policies (still in force) from medical associations in Europe and Australasia - the CDC suggested that the benefits of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this, opponents of MC do not accept the CDC's position. Two prominent opponents, Frisch and Earp, published arguments that led them to conclude that “from a scientific and medical perspective, current evidence suggests that circumcision is not an appropriate public health measure for developed countries such as the United States.” 6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite this, opponents of MC do not accept the CDC's position. Two prominent opponents, Frisch and Earp, published arguments that led them to conclude that “from a scientific and medical perspective, current evidence suggests that circumcision is not an appropriate public health measure for developed countries such as the United States.” 6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recently published article, Frisch and Earp 6 oppose the 2014 draft MC recommendations from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 3 referring to what they believe are “numerous scientific and conceptual shortcomings.” Here, we quote these 7 criticisms by Frisch and Earp and provide our response to each criticism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall complication rate for circumcision ranges from 0.2 to 10% with many USA physicians performing the procedure without formal training, being unaware of contraindications, and incapable of handling post-op complications (56, 91, 92). Lower complication rates for early and late adverse events have been attributed to underreporting with late adverse events mistakenly not attributed to circumcision (92, 93). Consequently, the low number ascribed to circumcision as the cause of death (63) may be underreported and erroneously attributed to other causes, such as sepsis (94) or SIDS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a vaginal ring containing dapivirine was recently shown to be partially efficacious in preventing HIV acquisition among women [46, 47]. Similarly, male circumcision [48, 49] and oral anti-retroviral (ARV) use as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have been found to be partially efficacious at preventing HIV acquisition in populations such as MSM, discordant couples, IDUs, heterosexual men, and some populations of women [5054]. Topical and systemic PrEP have shown more variable efficacy in women in sub-Saharan Africa than in MSM [5054].…”
Section: Accounting For the Evolving Hiv Prevention Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%