1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)91423-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulatory Effects at Rest and Exercise of Clonidine, an Imidazoline Derivative With Hypotensive Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with a number of previous reports (Morley et al 1991;Muzi et al 1992;Tulen et al 1992), clonidine had no significant effect on heart rate at 20 8C. Although there have been reports of bradycardia caused by clonidine (Barnett and Cantor 1968;Muir et al 1969;Fleming et al 1991), the effect of clonidine on heart rate is usually small (Reid 1981) and variable (Glue and Nutt 1988), probably reflecting the relatively low level of sympathetic drive to the hearts of resting subjects (Muzi et al 1992). However, when clonidine was applied at 40 8C it was able to antagonise the increase in heart rate evoked by high ambient temperature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In agreement with a number of previous reports (Morley et al 1991;Muzi et al 1992;Tulen et al 1992), clonidine had no significant effect on heart rate at 20 8C. Although there have been reports of bradycardia caused by clonidine (Barnett and Cantor 1968;Muir et al 1969;Fleming et al 1991), the effect of clonidine on heart rate is usually small (Reid 1981) and variable (Glue and Nutt 1988), probably reflecting the relatively low level of sympathetic drive to the hearts of resting subjects (Muzi et al 1992). However, when clonidine was applied at 40 8C it was able to antagonise the increase in heart rate evoked by high ambient temperature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As shown in figure 2, the changes in blood pres sure after acute administration of both drugs in normal volunteers were not even nominally significant at the 5% level, although guanfacine seemed to exert less of a hypotensive effect than clonidine over 8 h. However, clinical long-term guanfacine studies suggest that blood pressure is brought under control and stabilized at a nonpathological level within about 2 weeks [35]. And the decrease reached statistical significance in week 3 for systolic blood pressure and week 4 for diastolic blood pressure [22], while chronic treatment with clon idine has been reported to reduce blood pressure by less than it falls after a single dose [21,23,24]. This acute study did not produce any clear evidence regarding the relative superiority of the antihypertensive effect of the two drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have observed significant falls in pressure not only in essential hypertensives but also in normal subjects ( Figure 2) . The fall in pressure which is usually accompanied by a modest bradycardia appears to result from a fall in peripheral resistance and an additional but variable fall in cardiac output (Muir, Burton & Lawrie, 1969;Barnett & Cantor, 1968). After 300 ,ug orally, the fall in blood pressure is apparent by 1 h, maximal between 2 and 4 h and recovery takes place over 8-12 h. The fall in blood pressure after intravenous clonidine 300 ,ug was of similar magnitude and although the pressure fell within minutes of dosing the maximum fall was not observed for 1-2 h (Davies et al, 1977).…”
Section: Clinical Pharmacodynamics Of Clonidinementioning
confidence: 99%