Circulative Nonpropagative Aphid Transmission of Nanoviruses: an Oversimplified View

Abstract

Plant virus species of the family Nanoviridae have segmented genomes with the highest known number of segments encapsidated individually. They thus likely represent the most extreme case of the so-called multipartite, or multicomponent, viruses. All species of the family are believed to be transmitted in a circulative nonpropagative manner by aphid vectors, meaning that the virus simply crosses cellular barriers within the aphid body, from the gut to the salivary glands, without replicating or even expressing any of its genes. However, this assumption is largely based on analogy with the transmission of other plant viruses, such as geminiviruses or luteoviruses, and the details of the molecular and cellular interactions between aphids and nanoviruses are poorly investigated. When comparing the relative frequencies of the eight genome segments in populations of the species Faba bean necrotic stunt virus (FBNSV) (genus Nanovirus) within host plants and within aphid vectors fed on these plants, we unexpectedly found evidence of reproducible changes in the frequencies of some specific segments. We further show that these changes occur within the gut during early stages of the virus cycle in the aphid and not later, when the virus is translocated into the salivary glands. This peculiar observation, which was similarly confirmed in three aphid vector species, Acyrthosiphon pisum, Aphis craccivora, and Myzus persicae, calls for revisiting of the mechanisms of nanovirus transmission. It reveals an unexpected intimate interaction that may not fit the canonical circulative nonpropagative transmission. IMPORTANCEA specific mode of interaction between viruses and arthropod vectors has been extensively described in plant viruses in the three families Luteoviridae, Geminiviridae, and Nanoviridae, but never in arboviruses of animals. This so-called circulative nonpropagative transmission contrasts with the classical biological transmission of animal arboviruses in that the corresponding viruses are thought to cross the vector cellular barriers, from the gut lumen to the hemolymph and to the salivary glands, without expressing any of their genes and without replicating. By monitoring the genetic composition of viral populations during the life cycle of Faba bean necrotic stunt virus (FBNSV) (genus Nanovirus), we demonstrate reproducible genetic changes during the transit of the virus within the body of the aphid vector. These changes do not fit the view that viruses simply traverse the bodies of their arthropod vectors and suggest more intimate interactions, calling into question the current understanding of circulative nonpropagative transmission. P lant viruses of the families Luteoviridae, Geminiviridae, and Nanoviridae are transmitted in a circulative (persistent) nonpropagative manner by their insect vectors (1, 2). This transmission mode is characterized by the internalization of the virus within the insect without replication or even transcription of the viral genome. After feeding on an infected plant, the virus...

The Number of Target Molecules of the Amplification Step Limits Accuracy and Sensitivity in Ultradeep-Sequencing Viral Population Studies

“…Fluorescence data were first analyzed with the LinRegPCR program (33) and later converted into nanograms of DNA by using standard curves (data are available upon request). Genome formulas could then be estimated by calculating the relative proportions of each segment as described previously (34). Genome formulas were estimated before and after RCA.…”

Endemicity and prevalence of multipartite viruses under heterogeneous between-host transmission

“…Using both analytical calculations and numerical tools, we investigate the outcome of a random emergence of mutants, and derive the conditions that make multipartitism a fitness-enhancing strategy, allowing the virus to adapt to a wider range of hosts and environments. Since no apparent structural feature discriminates multipartite viruses from monopartite ones -they are found exhibiting different capsid structures, genome sizes and types [26] -we include in the model as few virological features as possible, and investigate how multipartitism impacts on the spreading potential of the virus. We do, however, account for key viral mechanisms that can drive the resilience of multipartitism in an ecological context.…”

The Strange Lifestyle of Multipartite Viruses

“…In particular, that distinct genome segments accumulate at very different frequencies within host plants [50,56] poses the question of the transmission of the rare segments. Likewise, because virus particles containing distinct genome segments may vary in stability [75], they might well be differentially degraded during the passage within the insect vectors [95], questioning whether the relative frequency of the segments may change within vectors and how the most labile particles can be transmitted as efficiently as the others. Finally, the bottleneck related to vector transmission in the wild could be alleviated by high vector population density and repeated inoculation.…”