2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41391-018-0098-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulating tumor DNA in advanced prostate cancer: transitioning from discovery to a clinically implemented test

Abstract: Summary The genomic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) differs from that of the primary tumor and is dynamic during tumor progression. The real-time and repeated characterization of this process via conventional solid tumor biopsies is challenging. Alternatively, circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) containing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be obtained from patient plasma using minimally disruptive blood draws and is amenable to sequential analysis. ctDNA has high o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become a promising tool in molecular oncology, allowing the detection of molecular alterations associated with cancer biology, treatment response [ 1 , 2 ] and overall survival (OS) [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. However, cfDNA analysis is subject to relevant limitations [ 7 ]. There still remain technical challenges to analyze small amounts of highly fragmented (150–200 bp) and diluted (nanograms per 1 mL plasma) cfDNA fractions that are attributable to tumors (circulating tumor DNA-ctDNA) within cfDNA that are shed from cancer cells and which generally comprise 1–2% or less of cfDNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become a promising tool in molecular oncology, allowing the detection of molecular alterations associated with cancer biology, treatment response [ 1 , 2 ] and overall survival (OS) [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. However, cfDNA analysis is subject to relevant limitations [ 7 ]. There still remain technical challenges to analyze small amounts of highly fragmented (150–200 bp) and diluted (nanograms per 1 mL plasma) cfDNA fractions that are attributable to tumors (circulating tumor DNA-ctDNA) within cfDNA that are shed from cancer cells and which generally comprise 1–2% or less of cfDNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we have discussed the advances in noninvasive DNA methylation prognostic biomarker research. Looking ahead, clinical translation of this research will be a priority as liquid biopsies offer a number of advantages over tissue-based methods, such as reducing side-effects like infection and surgical complications [ 17 , 18 ], and allowing serial collection of samples during the course of monitoring or therapy to provide opportunities for timely therapeutic interventions [ 177 ]. This should be paired with the utilisation of DNA methylation assays suitable for application in clinical settings (for example, Multiplex Bisulfite PCR Sequencing [ 178 , 179 ]) which are cost-effective, scalable, reproducible and capable of sensitively detecting methylated tumour DNA in limited clinical material such as liquid biopsies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we have discussed the advances in non-invasive DNA methylation prognostic biomarker research. Looking ahead, clinical translation of this research will be a priority as liquid biopsies offer a number of advantages over tissue-based methods, such as reducing side-effects like infection and surgical complications [17,18], and allowing serial collection of samples during the course of monitoring or therapy to provide opportunities for timely therapeutic interventions [176]. This should be paired with the utilisation of DNA methylation assays suitable for application in clinical settings (for example, Multiplex Bisulfite PCR Sequencing [177,178]) which are cost-effective, scalable, reproducible, and capable of sensitively detecting methylated tumour DNA in limited clinical material such as liquid biopsies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%