2018
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.3533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as an early marker to monitor clinical benefit of regorafenib and TAS-102 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with metastatic CRC who have a longer PFS on regorafenib and TAS-102 have an early decline in mutant DNA fraction, in contrast to those with a shorter PFS who either have an increase or minimal early change in mutant DNA fraction 65,66 . In patients with metastatic CRC with ctDNA progression, defined as any increase in VAF on regorafenib or TAS-102, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of ctDNA progression for the detection of subsequent radiographic progressive disease were 61.5%, 100% and 100%, respectively 67 . Thus, based on the data from these studies, establishing the validity of early changes in ctDNA as surrogate markers for clinical response in patients on later lines of therapy, in whom the prior probability of benefit is low and the risk of harm is high, is imperative.…”
Section: Box 4 | Key Recommendations On the Management Of Rectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with metastatic CRC who have a longer PFS on regorafenib and TAS-102 have an early decline in mutant DNA fraction, in contrast to those with a shorter PFS who either have an increase or minimal early change in mutant DNA fraction 65,66 . In patients with metastatic CRC with ctDNA progression, defined as any increase in VAF on regorafenib or TAS-102, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of ctDNA progression for the detection of subsequent radiographic progressive disease were 61.5%, 100% and 100%, respectively 67 . Thus, based on the data from these studies, establishing the validity of early changes in ctDNA as surrogate markers for clinical response in patients on later lines of therapy, in whom the prior probability of benefit is low and the risk of harm is high, is imperative.…”
Section: Box 4 | Key Recommendations On the Management Of Rectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers found that higher proportion of ctDNA mutation positive patients (27.8%) experienced disease progression compared to those who were ctDNA mutation negative (4.4%) after surgery (25). Another study showed the reliability of ctDNA in predicting the response to regorafenib or TAS-102 in patients with metastatic CRC using different PCR based methods (26). Cabel et al conducted a study on 36 anal cancer patients in France and reported that post-chemoradiotherapy detection of ctDNA is associated with worse outcomes.…”
Section: Ctdna As a Prognostic Biomarkermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies were also performed to assess the response to regorafenib and TAS-102 by ctDNA analysis. Patients who had an early decline in this analyte in the plasma experienced better PFS in contrast with those with a minimal change or increase in the ctDNA levels [111][112][113].…”
Section: Therapeutic Response Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…ctDNA could be crucial to assess the response to standard chemotherapy, as it can facilitate the early discontinuation of ineffective therapies, especially considering the last lines where preserving the patient's quality of life is crucial [111][112][113]. In the meantime, it could provide information on the possible mechanisms of resistance in particular when using anti-EGFRs to guide clinicians in the choice of rechallenge [144].…”
Section: Future Perspectives and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%