2018
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulating miR-106b-3p, miR-101-3p and miR-1246 as diagnostic biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver cancer and second leading cause of cancer related death worldwide. Most HCCs occur in a damaged cirrhotic background and it may be difficult to discriminate between regenerative nodules and early HCCs. No dependable molecular biomarker exists for the early detection of HCC. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have attracted attention as potential blood-based biomarkers. To identify circulating miRNAs with diagnostic potential in HCC, we performed preliminary RNAseq studie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
65
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our results fit a model of translational suppression by AML-EV miRNA [64] and find support in existing reports of miRNA suppression of protein synthesis [65,66] and Raptor deregulation in hematopoietic cells [67][68][69]. Although miR-1246 was previously identified as a regulator of cancer progression, drug resistance [70,71], and a putative biomarker [31,72], our data suggest a role in regulating other tissue compartments, including BM HSC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, our results fit a model of translational suppression by AML-EV miRNA [64] and find support in existing reports of miRNA suppression of protein synthesis [65,66] and Raptor deregulation in hematopoietic cells [67][68][69]. Although miR-1246 was previously identified as a regulator of cancer progression, drug resistance [70,71], and a putative biomarker [31,72], our data suggest a role in regulating other tissue compartments, including BM HSC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, Raptor was previously shown to be required for HSC regeneration and its loss led to accumulation of monocytoid cells, pancytopenia, and splenomegaly in mice [63]. Although miR-1246 was previously identified as a regulator of cancer progression, drug resistance [70,71], and a putative biomarker [31,72], our data suggest a role in regulating other tissue compartments, including BM HSC. Thus, our results fit a model of translational suppression by AML-EV miRNA [64] and find support in existing reports of miRNA suppression of protein synthesis [65,66] and Raptor deregulation in hematopoietic cells [67][68][69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Moshiri et al . reported the clinical utility of miR‐1246 as a plasma, but not serum, diagnostic biomarker of HCC . However, Wang et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they have the potential to serve as biomarkers for the diagnosis, staging, progression, and prognosis of cancer . This is evident from several published reports that have shown the use of circulating miRNAs in early cancer detection, such as miR‐196a in gastric cancer, and the diagnostic roles of miR‐106b‐3p, miR‐101‐3p, and miR‐1246 in hepatocellular carcinoma . In lung cancer, low expression of the circulating miRNA‐34 family was associated with clinicopathological status and poor progression‐free and overall survival of NSCLC patients .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…15 This is evident from several published reports that have shown the use of circulating miRNAs in early cancer detection, such as miR-196a in gastric cancer, 16 and the diagnostic roles of miR-106b-3p, miR-101-3p, and miR-1246 in hepatocellular carcinoma. 17 In lung cancer, low expression of the circulating miRNA-34 family was associated with clinicopathological status and poor progression-free and overall survival of NSCLC patients. 18 miR-223, miR-20a, miR-448, and miR-145, as serum/plasma miRNA signatures, have shown high sensitivity (>80%), whereas another panel including miR-628-3p, miR-29c, miR-210, and miR-1244 have shown high specificity (>90%) to stage I-II NSCLC samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%