2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28955-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulating microRNA expression signatures accurately discriminate myalgic encephalomyelitis from fibromyalgia and comorbid conditions

Abstract: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), and fibromyalgia (FM) are two chronic complex diseases with overlapping symptoms affecting multiple systems and organs over time. Due to the absence of validated biomarkers and similarity in symptoms, both disorders are misdiagnosed, and the comorbidity of the two is often unrecognized. Our study aimed to investigate the expression profiles of 11 circulating miRNAs previously associated with ME/CFS pathogenesis in FM patients and individuals with a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With no biomarkers available and unclear pathophysiology, ME/CFS and FM are often misdiagnosed, further complicating the identification of effective treatments. In this study, we tried to overcome patient heterogeneity by studying a very finely-phenotyped cohort diagnosed by a single expert clinician, representing one of the few studies ( 13 ) including samples of patients diagnosed with either ME/CFS, FM, or both (comorbid group) by two different clinical criteria (Canadian ( 4 ) and International Consensus ( 5 ) criteria, and the 1990 ( 7 ) and 2011 ( 3, 6 ) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With no biomarkers available and unclear pathophysiology, ME/CFS and FM are often misdiagnosed, further complicating the identification of effective treatments. In this study, we tried to overcome patient heterogeneity by studying a very finely-phenotyped cohort diagnosed by a single expert clinician, representing one of the few studies ( 13 ) including samples of patients diagnosed with either ME/CFS, FM, or both (comorbid group) by two different clinical criteria (Canadian ( 4 ) and International Consensus ( 5 ) criteria, and the 1990 ( 7 ) and 2011 ( 3, 6 ) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their frequent co-diagnosis drove the hypothesis of a "single syndrome" and promoted the search for common or differentiating factors (8)(9)(10). However, despite molecular support for ME/CFS and FM constituting different entities (11)(12)(13), their frequent joint appearance (over 50% comorbidity in females) (14) remains enigmatic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, machine-learning approaches have been adopted to assist analysis of large data sets containing multiple parameters. 193,195,207,208 In addition to molecular markers, in vitro cell-based assays have been suggested as screening platforms. In one scenario, the cells are used as reporters to detect the existence of metabolic, cytokine, RNA, and other biomolecules in ME/CFS body fluids, based on the rich literature on the altered molecular profiles in these fluids.…”
Section: New Perspectives On Topics Of Interest For Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parallel to the effort to study single or a small number of potential biological markers, −omic approaches have been applied to analyze DNA, 95,191 RNA, 192 protein, 193–195 peptide, metabolic products, 158,196–200 microbiome, 134,189,201–204 and virome 192,205,206 in ME/CFS samples, aiming to understand disease pathology and mechanisms, and identify biomarker panels of diagnostic potential (Figure 4). Recently, machine‐learning approaches have been adopted to assist analysis of large data sets containing multiple parameters 193,195,207,208 . In addition to molecular markers, in vitro cell‐based assays have been suggested as screening platforms.…”
Section: Perspectives: Where We Are Looking and Where We Might Lookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www. mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14071312/s1, Table S1: literature miRNAs [24][25][26][27][63][64][65][66][67][68]; Table S2: miRNASNP-v3 prediction; Table S3: miRDB target prediction.…”
Section: Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%