1982
DOI: 10.4141/cjas82-009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulating Estrogen Levels in the Ram: Influence of Season and Mating, and Their Relationship to Testosterone Levels and Mating Frequency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As early as week 2, however, the initial LH response appeared to be blunted (Fig. 4) Sanford et al 1982) and increase in concert with testosterone levels (r:0.88) in late summer and early fall (Sanford et al 1982). In the present study, levels of estradiol in the immunized rams were presumed to have been neutralized effectively in that an excess of antibody-binding capacity was in the circulation throughout the immunization period.…”
Section: Passive Immunizationmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As early as week 2, however, the initial LH response appeared to be blunted (Fig. 4) Sanford et al 1982) and increase in concert with testosterone levels (r:0.88) in late summer and early fall (Sanford et al 1982). In the present study, levels of estradiol in the immunized rams were presumed to have been neutralized effectively in that an excess of antibody-binding capacity was in the circulation throughout the immunization period.…”
Section: Passive Immunizationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…1981) and gonadal steroid levels in the with acute neutralization where increases in blood circulation (Sanford et al 1977(Sanford et al , 1982 testosterone secretion occur independent of increase. Sertoli cells undergo nuclear hyper-proportionate increases in LH pulsatility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although oestradiol implants can suppress plasma levels of LH and FSH in intact (Jenkins & Waites, 1983) and castrated (Schanbacher & Ford, 1977;Alexander & Miller, 1982) sheep, neither in the present study nor that of Land et al (1981) were plasma LH or FSH concentrations significantly affected by removal of endogenous oestrogens. Whilst removal of negative feedback by immunization might be expected to increase the production of both oestradiol and androgens (Nieschlag & Wickings, 1978), the titre of antibody achieved in this study by passive immunization was capable of binding at least 132 times the circu¬ lating oestradiol concentration in male sheep (Sandford et al, 1982). The oestradiol binding capacity in EAB-treated animals, was therefore unlikely to be saturated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Manipulation of circulating oestradiol concentrations by steroid implantation (Jenkins & Waites, 1983) or by immunization (Land, Baird & Carr, 1981) has provided evidence for a physiological role for oestrogens in the developing male lamb. Oestradiol implants induced a suppression of the secretion of LH and FSH in intact male lambs (Jenkins & Waites, 1983) and in castrated rams (Schanbacher & Ford, 1977;Alexander & Miller, 1982), although normal endogenous con¬ centrations of oestradiol-17ß are < 15 pg/ml in adult rams (Sandford, Simaraks, Palmer & Howland, 1982). Active immunization against oestradiol resulted in elevated circulating concen¬ trations of testosterone and LH in male rats (Nishihara & Takahashi, 1983) and in adult rams (Schanbacher, 1984) whereas no significant changes in plasma LH or FSH values were observed in male lambs passively immunized against oestradiol or oestrone (Land et ai, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%