2016
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulating cell-free DNA has a high degree of specificity to detect exon 19 deletions and the single-point substitution mutation L858R in non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract: Detection of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a noninvasive method to collect genetic information to guide treatment of lung cancer with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the association between cfDNA and detection of EGFR mutations in tumor tissue remains unclear. Here, a meta-analysis was performed to determine whether cfDNA could serve as a substitute for tissue specimens for the detection of EGFR mutations. The pooled sensitivity, specifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a survey of several cancer types, 82% of patients with stage IV cancer have been detected with plasma circulating tumor DNA, which is similar to the present study despite two different methods being used (ARMS vs. NGS). A meta‐analysis of 27 studies published between 2007 and 2015 using a wide variety of methods and including nearly 4000 patients showed a comprehensive sensitivity of 60% in detecting plasma or serum EGFR mutations, with 94% specificity …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a survey of several cancer types, 82% of patients with stage IV cancer have been detected with plasma circulating tumor DNA, which is similar to the present study despite two different methods being used (ARMS vs. NGS). A meta‐analysis of 27 studies published between 2007 and 2015 using a wide variety of methods and including nearly 4000 patients showed a comprehensive sensitivity of 60% in detecting plasma or serum EGFR mutations, with 94% specificity …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Lee et al found a relation of early tumor recurrence and chromosomal instability with drug resistance [26][27][28]. Misale et al performed genotyping on cfDNA exacted from plasma of 24 patients with colorectal cancer, and showed that clinical resistance arose through the acquisition of mutations detected by cfDNA [22,29]. Similarly, EGFR-activating mutations in cfDNA were found to be present before initiating erlotinib therapy, but decreased or disappeared during therapy [30,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in the last decade an alternative not invasive approach, known as liquid biopsy, has been proposed to overcome the aforementioned issues. An increasing number of studies and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic value of plasma-based EGFR testing in the management of NSCLC patients, overall showing a sensitivity of 0.62 and a specificity of 0.96 as compared with the standard tissue genotyping, which suggest an adequate diagnostic accuracy of circulating tumor (ct)DNA analysis (Qiu et al, 2015;Wu et al, 2015;Qian et al, 2016;Luo et al, 2014). These evidences have led to the analytical validation and the clinical approval of EGFR mutation testing by using ctDNA isolated from plasma or serum of about 30% of patients whose tissue is not available at diagnosis or tissue analysis results are not evaluable (Fig.…”
Section: Potential Application At Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%