1980
DOI: 10.1159/000181943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulating Anti-Tubular Basement Membrane Antibody in a Variety of Human Renal Diseases

Abstract: Serum specimens from 99 selected renal patients were examined over a 3-year period by both a hemagglutination technique (HA) and an indirect immunofluorescent (IIF) method for the presence of circulating antibody against tubular basement membrane (TBM). 11 patients were found with anti-TBM antibodies. 6 of them also had antibody against glomΕrular basement membrane (GBM). The other 5 with anti-TBM antibody alone, had a unique natural history and response to therapy which suggested that the antibody was importa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TBM deposition is not common in anti-GBM nephritis [22]. We suggested that the high detection rate of IgG deposits along TBM may be due to the high sensitivity of immunohistochemistry used in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…TBM deposition is not common in anti-GBM nephritis [22]. We suggested that the high detection rate of IgG deposits along TBM may be due to the high sensitivity of immunohistochemistry used in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Test results were read from the standard curve with a range of 0-100 units. Free antibody was determined by two methods: indirect immunofluorescence (IFF) using normal rat kidney as a target with counterstaining by goat antirat IgG and by hemaggluti nation assay (HA) (20).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive control for HA consisted of sensitized cells plus rabbit antirat FXIA [20] in serial dilution and a negative control was normal rat serum as well as test rat serum against unsensitized cells plus diluent and phosphate-buffered saline. All rats were bled serially every 1-2 weeks, in order to compare CIC and Ab changes over time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human and rat FX1A fraction against rabbit anti-FX1A was used as a positive control with a negative control normal rat sera against the anti-FXIA antibody. Free Ab was determined by two methods: IIF using normal human kidney as a target with counterstaining by goat antirat IgG and by hemagglutination assay (HA) [2]. A positive control consisted of sensitized cells plus rabbit anti-FXIA in serial dilution and a negative control was normal rat serum as well as test rat serum against unsensitized cells plus diluent and PBS.…”
Section: Immune Complex Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%