2009
DOI: 10.1163/156939309787604373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circularly-Polarized Reconfigurable Microstrip Antenna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compact three-port branching OMT [17] composed by two H-plane rectangular waveguides coupled with a common circular waveguide uses two bottle-neck-like irises to match the structure and realize the isolation, whose return loss < −10 dB had a bandwidth < 12%, and isolation < −35 dB with a bandwidth > 10%. Other kind of circular polarizers such as microstrip polarizer [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] also have the disadvantage of narrow bandwidth and low efficiency due to losses of conductor, dielectric and surface wave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compact three-port branching OMT [17] composed by two H-plane rectangular waveguides coupled with a common circular waveguide uses two bottle-neck-like irises to match the structure and realize the isolation, whose return loss < −10 dB had a bandwidth < 12%, and isolation < −35 dB with a bandwidth > 10%. Other kind of circular polarizers such as microstrip polarizer [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] also have the disadvantage of narrow bandwidth and low efficiency due to losses of conductor, dielectric and surface wave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce the loss caused by the misalignment between the signal and the receiving antenna and allow more flexible orientation of the transmitter and receiver antennas, the circularly polarized microstrip antennas [1] with small size, light weight and low profile win more and more applications in wireless communications. However, some traditional proximity coupled CP microstrip antennas [2] have more complex geometry, larger size or higher loss at the feeding network compared to the newly reported antennas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simultaneously support several satellite systems whose operating bands are closely spaced, large 3-dB axial-ratio bandwidths (ARBWs) are required for the antennas to be devised. Many popular circularly polarized (CP) patch antennas [3][4][5][6][7] and loop antennas [8,9] have narrower CP bandwidths of less than 20%. Known not only for their compactness and low-profile features but also for their easily attained large CP bandwidths using simple design technologies and constructions, printed slot antennas have received much attention in recent years [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%