Circularity for Electric and Electronic Equipment (EEE), the Edge and Distributed Ledger (Edge&DL) Model

Abstract

In the transition to a circular focus on electric and electronic products, manufacturers play a key role as the originators of both the products and the information about the products. While the waste electric and electronic equipment (WEEE) directive’s contemporary focus is on handling the product as waste after its end of life, the circular economy focuses on retaining the product’s value with a restorative system. The polluter-pays principle requires producers of pollution to bear the costs of handling the pollution, leading to the extended producer responsibility (EPR) principle. This requires manufacturers to change their focus from their current passive role of out-sourcing end-of-life treatment to taking explicit responsibility for product management over an extended period of time. This paper investigates how a manufacturer can assume its responsibility to achieve circularity for its products. Based on our findings, three fundamental circularity principles, the circular electric and electronic equipment (CEEE) principles, for manufactures of electronic and electrical equipment are defined: (1) Serialize product identifiers, (2) data controlled by their authoritative source at the edge, and (3) independent actors’ access to edge data via a distributer ledger are the foundation of the Edge and Distributed Ledger (Edge&DL) model. We demonstrate the model through a case study of how to achieve circularity for lighting equipment. The CEEE principles and the demonstrated model contribute to building new circularity systems for electronic and electric products that let manufacturers undertake their extended product responsibility.

Critical success factors for implementing blockchain‐based circular supply chain

“…Because of the embryonic nature of blockchain (Esmaeilian et al, 2020) and the dearth of use cases in the CE realm (Andersen & Jaeger, 2021), this paper attempts to contribute to theory by identifying the CSF for blockchain-enabled CSCs and their relative importance. This study provides three important contributions.…”

Towards the Smart Circular Economy Paradigm: A Definition, Conceptualization, and Research Agenda

“…In this work, the authors stressed how supply chain optimization, employing the IoT in logistics and distribution processes, helps to achieve savings in holding and transportation costs and, at the same time, reduce CO 2 over-production and transportation emissions (from optimizing inventory share policies). The paper by Andersen and Jaeger [69] investigated how manufacturers of electrical and electronic equipment can build on extended producer responsibility to increase the circularity of products. They explained how the adoption of blockchain in supply chains can increase remanufacturing and recycling to reduce waste generation, especially in electrical and electronic equipment.…”

Sustainable Circular Micro Index for Evaluating Virtual Substitution Using Machine Learning with the Path Planning Problem as a Case Study

“…A comprehensive study on digital technologies beneficial for a digital circular economy is presented at [33]. Through the approach of connecting devices to the internet, proposals are developed based on data tracking for decision making for the recruitment and use of products shown in the works [34,35].…”