Circular RNA circFAT1(e2) Facilitates Cell Progression through the miR-30e-5P/MYBL2 Pathway in Glioma

Abstract

Objective. To explore the mechanism of glioma from MYB family genes from the perspective of the circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network. Methods. First, the MYB family genes were analyzed by multiple bioinformatics analyses to identify one gene most associated with glioma. Then, the prognostic value and clinical characteristics of the gene were evaluated by bioinformatics analysis and experiments in glioma cells. Next, the target miRNA and circRNA were predicted and verified by dual-luciferase reporter assays. Besides, the functions of target circRNA in glioma were investigated by CCK-8 and Transwell assays. At last, the relation between the screened MYB gene, miRNA, and circRNA in glioma was identified by rescue experiments. Results. After expression and Cox and survival analysis of six MYB family genes, MYBL2 was identified as the gene most associated with glioma. Then, we found that MYBL2 expression in primary gliomas was higher than those in other histologies, and it had variable expression according to clinical features. Furthermore, MYBL2 knockdown in glioma cells impairs cell growth, invasion, and migration in functional studies. Then, miR-30e-5p and circFAT1(e2) were identified as targets of MYBL2 by bioinformatics prediction and experimental verification. Finally, the relationship between circFAT1(e2), MYBL2, and miR-30e-5p was elucidated by rescue experiments. Conclusion. circFAT1(e2) could promote glioma development by regulating MYBL2 and miR-30e-5p, and MYBL2 has diagnostic and prognostic values in glioma.

Retracted: Circular RNA circFAT1(e2) Facilitates Cell Progression through the miR-30e-5P/MYBL2 Pathway in Glioma

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”