2001
DOI: 10.2307/3088355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circular, Invisible, and Ambiguous Migrants: Components of Difference in Estimates of the Number of Unauthorized Mexican Migrants in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the1997 National Survey of Demographic Dynamics (ENADID; National Institute of Statistics and Geography n.d.) to estimate population (2) – Mexicans with prior migration to the United States that remained in Mexico during the previous five-year period. The ENADID is a nationally representative demographic survey in Mexico that has been previously used to examine U.S.-Mexico migration (e.g., Bean, Corona, Tuiran, and Woodrow-Lafield 1998; Hill and Wong 2005; Massey 1987a; Rendall et al 2011). Unlike IPUMS Mexico, the ENADID indicates whether respondents had ever returned from the United States, not just those who returned within the previous five years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the1997 National Survey of Demographic Dynamics (ENADID; National Institute of Statistics and Geography n.d.) to estimate population (2) – Mexicans with prior migration to the United States that remained in Mexico during the previous five-year period. The ENADID is a nationally representative demographic survey in Mexico that has been previously used to examine U.S.-Mexico migration (e.g., Bean, Corona, Tuiran, and Woodrow-Lafield 1998; Hill and Wong 2005; Massey 1987a; Rendall et al 2011). Unlike IPUMS Mexico, the ENADID indicates whether respondents had ever returned from the United States, not just those who returned within the previous five years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Variations also depend on a range of contextual situations. 7 These variations are often large, sometimes diametrically opposed and can have important policy implications (see Bean et al 2001). In particular, one can observe significant variations when analysing the economic impact of immigration.…”
Section: The Contrasting Numbers Of Illegal Immigrationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Between 1990 and 2000, the Latino population increased from 2.3% to 3.7% (Chester County Planning Commission, 2001) and to an average of 5% between 2005 and 2009 (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2010). Given that these are official estimates and may not account for the presence of undocumented immigrants (Bean, Corona, Tuiran, Woodrow-Lafield, & Van Hook, 2001), it is likely the population growth is even more significant. As a result, community-based social service and health care providers have struggled to serve monolingual Spanish-speaking newcomers with their largely monolingual Englishspeaking staff.…”
Section: Introduction Demographic Shifts: Implications For Social Wormentioning
confidence: 99%