2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2013.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulant partial Hadamard matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H ∈ M M ×N (±1), the existence of the completion is known to be automatic at any M = N − K, with K ≤ 7. See [8], [16], and for more recent analysis of related completion problems [6].…”
Section: Completion Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H ∈ M M ×N (±1), the existence of the completion is known to be automatic at any M = N − K, with K ≤ 7. See [8], [16], and for more recent analysis of related completion problems [6].…”
Section: Completion Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be easily proved that the equality holds only if r = 2 by counting the allocation of lambdas. Craigen et al (2013) has proven that m < n/2 as r = 0 by linear algebra, it can also be proven by a discussion of differences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Following (Kao (2015)), the Paley difference sets can also be adopted to obtain some 0-H(m × n), although this was not pointed out in that paper. While this method gives an infinite number of 0-H(m × n), the value of m for each n may be relatively small compared to the maximum possible m. For example, the Paley difference set can achieve an 0-H(5 × 20), but the maximum m for this n = 20 is m = 7 (Craigen et al (2013); Low et al (2005)). Clearly, the existence of r-H(m × n) implies the existence of r-H((m − 1) × n).…”
Section: Preliminaries and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Universally optimal designs in D N for comparing HRFs of length K ≤ G + 1 can also be obtained by using a (G + 1)-by-N circulant partial Hadamard matrix with zero row sums. As described in Craigen et al (2013), for such a matrix, C = ((c g,n )) g=1,..., G+1,n=1,...,N , we have that the entries c g,n ∈ {−1, 1}, Cj N = 0, CC ′ = N I G+1 , and the gth row is obtained by cyclically shifting the (g − 1)st row one position to the right with c g,1 = c g−1,N and c g,n = c g−1,n−1 for g = 2, . .…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%