2016
DOI: 10.1167/16.8.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circuitry to explain how the relative number of L and M cones shapes color experience

Abstract: The wavelength of light that appears unique yellow is surprisingly consistent across people even though the ratio of middle (M) to long (L) wavelength sensitive cones is strikingly variable. This observation has been explained by normalization to the mean spectral distribution of our shared environment. Our purpose was to reconcile the nearly perfect alignment of everyone's unique yellow through a normalization process with the striking variability in unique green, which varies by as much as 60 nm between indi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(120 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They can detect edges based either on luminance or spectral contrast but are unlikely to have any role in hue perception. Moreover, the S vs. L+M spectral tuning in both neurons does not match the cone inputs to blue-yellow hue perception 23,64,68,78,79 and a subset of midget RGCs with cone inputs matching the fundamental hues 21,22,27,70 has been proposed to mediate hue perception instead (for review, see Neitz & Neitz 54 ). These L vs. M midget RGCs with significant S-cone input to the surround receptive field are another controversial midget RGC subtype that warrants additional investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can detect edges based either on luminance or spectral contrast but are unlikely to have any role in hue perception. Moreover, the S vs. L+M spectral tuning in both neurons does not match the cone inputs to blue-yellow hue perception 23,64,68,78,79 and a subset of midget RGCs with cone inputs matching the fundamental hues 21,22,27,70 has been proposed to mediate hue perception instead (for review, see Neitz & Neitz 54 ). These L vs. M midget RGCs with significant S-cone input to the surround receptive field are another controversial midget RGC subtype that warrants additional investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combinations of S-cone inputs to L/M opponent midget ganglion cells produces exactly the hue axes corresponding to phenomenological hues. 62,63 As evidence, for the proposed hue encoding midget ganglion cells, a small number of L/M opponent ganglion cells with S-cone input have consistently been reported at different levels of the visual pathway, in the retina, 66,67 LGN 69,70 primary visual cortex 71,72 and at higher centers in the ventral visual processing stream, in inferior temporal cortex. 73 In our own laboratory, recording from an ex vivo preparation of macaque retina 6,74 we have confirmed the presence of a small subset of L/M opponent midget ganglion cells with S-cone input.…”
Section: Unique Huesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For the submosaics of midget bipolar cells with GABA-mediated S-cone feedforward input, these four types have cone inputs, as discussed below, that correspond exactly to those responsible for the four unique hues in modern humans. 62,63 L-ON-center for yellow, L-OFF-center for blue, M-ON-center for green, and M-OFF-center for red. In each case, the center L or M cone has an opposed feedforward input from an S-cone.…”
Section: Separating Chromatic and Achromatic Perceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations