1995
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00694-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circadian rhythms in mice can be regulated by photoreceptors with cone-like characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
98
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
10
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Action spectra of rodent circadian responses more closely resemble the spectral absorbance profile of opsin-based photopigments rather than flavin-based cryptochromes (Takahashi et al, 1984;Provencio and Foster, 1995;Yoshimura and Ebihara, 1996). Melanopsin is one of four opsins expressed outside the photoreceptor layer in human and mouse retinas, the other three being retinal G-protein-coupled receptor (RGR), peropsin, and encephalopsin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Action spectra of rodent circadian responses more closely resemble the spectral absorbance profile of opsin-based photopigments rather than flavin-based cryptochromes (Takahashi et al, 1984;Provencio and Foster, 1995;Yoshimura and Ebihara, 1996). Melanopsin is one of four opsins expressed outside the photoreceptor layer in human and mouse retinas, the other three being retinal G-protein-coupled receptor (RGR), peropsin, and encephalopsin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When taken at face value, one might come to the conclusion that a Cry-like protein is responsible for light-dependent entrainment of the zebrafish circadian clock. However, until detailed action spectra analyses and functional experiments are done, the possibility still exists that novel opsins, similar to those predicted to be responsible for mammalian photoreception (30)(31)(32), are the primary circadian photopigments in zebrafish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in part because the same experiments on a different strain of rd mice gave a λ max between 500 nm and 515 nm (ref. 32) and interpreted to reflect the action spectrum of mouse middle-wavelength-sensitive (M)-cones, the significance of the first study was never settled. With the rd/rd cl mouse line described here in which the loss of rods and cones is essentially complete, however, the signal from residual cones is no longer an issue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%