2020
DOI: 10.1002/ase.1989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cinematic Rendering in Anatomy: A Crossover Study Comparing a Novel 3D Reconstruction Technique to Conventional Computed Tomography

Abstract: Integration of medical imaging into preclinical anatomy courses is already underway in many medical schools. However, interpretation of two-dimensional grayscale images is difficult and conventional volume rendering techniques provide only images of limited quality. In this regard, a more photorealistic visualization provided by Cinematic Rendering (CR) may be more suitable for anatomical education. A randomized, two-period crossover study was conducted from July to December 2018, at the University Hospital of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,16 Many pictorial reviews and numerous case reports have provided examples of CR images showing a more photorealistic representation of tumours, bones, and blood vessels, and thus demonstrating the potential of CR reconstructions in aiding doctor-patient communication, treatment planning, and medical education. 10,[17][18][19][20][21] However, a study that has objectively evaluated the clinical value of the CR technique applied to maxillofacial fractures has not yet been published. 22 In the present study, the value of CR reconstructions of maxillofacial fractures in clinical application was evaluated, and comparisons were made with VR reconstructions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15,16 Many pictorial reviews and numerous case reports have provided examples of CR images showing a more photorealistic representation of tumours, bones, and blood vessels, and thus demonstrating the potential of CR reconstructions in aiding doctor-patient communication, treatment planning, and medical education. 10,[17][18][19][20][21] However, a study that has objectively evaluated the clinical value of the CR technique applied to maxillofacial fractures has not yet been published. 22 In the present study, the value of CR reconstructions of maxillofacial fractures in clinical application was evaluated, and comparisons were made with VR reconstructions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Many reviews and numerous case reports have provided examples of the maxillofacial and skull base anatomy that show the potential for CR images to assist in doctor-patient communication and treatment planning. [7][8][9][10] Berger et al 11 and Wollschlaeger et al 12 reported that the CR technique is superior to the VR technique in the visualization of multi-fragmentary intra-articular lower extremity fractures and ankle sprains. However, studies to determine the clinical value of the CR technique when applied to maxillofacial fractures have not yet been published.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This novel rendering algorithm simulates the propagation and interaction of light passing through the volumetric images. Elshafei et al [87] compared cinematic rendering with conventional computed tomography imaging in a randomised, two-sequence crossover study. Cinematic rendering allowed for faster and more correct comprehension of the surgical anatomy.…”
Section: Discussion (Perfect)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another step, which we also took in the 1990s, was the integration of radiological images (x-ray, CT, MR, ultrasound) into conventional anatomy lessons [4]. Since then, these new methods, which can be subsumed under the term virtual anatomy, have become more and more important in terms of mixed learning and are particularly well accepted by students [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%