2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) genotype and body composition

Abstract: Exogenous ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) administration causes significant weight loss in both humans and animal models, but the effects of endogenous CNTF and the CNTF null allele on body composition are not fully understood. A recent study in a European cohort demonstrated a significantly higher body weight and body mass index (BMI) in older males homozygous for the CNTF null allele (A/A genotype). We sought to replicate these findings in three cohorts: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging (BLSA) co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these studies, the most frequent ones were those pertaining to markers of UCP2 (139,140,165,166,167,168,169,170) (eight studies), APOE (171,172,173,174,175,176,177) (seven studies), PPARG (121,175,178,179,180,181) (six studies), ACDC (182,183,184,185,186), ADRB3 (187,188,189,190,191), and GNB3 (192,193,194,195,196) (five studies each), and ACE (195,197,198,199), IL6 (200,201,202,203), IRS1 (204,205,206,207), and LEPR (208,209,210,211) (four studies each). Other markers yielding negative findings were those related to ADRB2 (212), AGT (213,214), APOA4 (215), APOB (216), APOC3 (217), BBS1 (218), BCHE (219), BDKRB2 (220), CAPN10 (221), CCL2 (222), CNTF (223), COL1A1 (224), COMT (225), CRHR2 (23), CRP (226), CYP11B2 (227), CYP17A1 (225), EDN1 (228), ENPP1 (178,229), ESR1 (230), F7 (231), FABP2 (232,233), GHSR (234), GLP1R (235), GPR10 (236), GPX1 (237), GRLN (238), HSD11B1 (239), HTR2C (240…”
Section: Association Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these studies, the most frequent ones were those pertaining to markers of UCP2 (139,140,165,166,167,168,169,170) (eight studies), APOE (171,172,173,174,175,176,177) (seven studies), PPARG (121,175,178,179,180,181) (six studies), ACDC (182,183,184,185,186), ADRB3 (187,188,189,190,191), and GNB3 (192,193,194,195,196) (five studies each), and ACE (195,197,198,199), IL6 (200,201,202,203), IRS1 (204,205,206,207), and LEPR (208,209,210,211) (four studies each). Other markers yielding negative findings were those related to ADRB2 (212), AGT (213,214), APOA4 (215), APOB (216), APOC3 (217), BBS1 (218), BCHE (219), BDKRB2 (220), CAPN10 (221), CCL2 (222), CNTF (223), COL1A1 (224), COMT (225), CRHR2 (23), CRP (226), CYP11B2 (227), CYP17A1 (225), EDN1 (228), ENPP1 (178,229), ESR1 (230), F7 (231), FABP2 (232,233), GHSR (234), GLP1R (235), GPR10 (236), GPX1 (237), GRLN (238), HSD11B1 (239), HTR2C (240…”
Section: Association Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O'Dell et al (17) found that males who were homozygous for this naturally occurring null mutation had significantly higher body weight (BW) and BMI than did those who were not homozygous. Others have reported no association (15,18). Therefore, in the current study, we assessed the possible relations between the GRL, CNTF, and PPAR␥2 genotypes and WM after a period of weight loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several studies attempted to correlate CNTF genotype and body mass. Except in a report showing that the homozygous null mutation of the CNTF gene is associated to increased body mass in humans [19], no link was found between CNTF gene disruption and body weight [16,20]. However, compensatory mechanisms cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Besides, the role of CNTF as an endogenous modulator of energy homeostasis has not been yet determined. Indeed, correlation studies between CNTF gene disruption and body weight in mice or humans provided controversial data [16–20]. However, compensatory pathways cannot be excluded in such genetic approaches [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%