2012
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cigarette Smoking is Paradoxically Associated With Low Mortality Risk After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: In this study, in which the patients received up-to-date treatment options, smoking was associated with a 48% decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality at 1 year after AMI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, both smoking and obesity were risk factors for AMI development, but were associated with decreased mortality rates after AMI. These phenomena were also observed in KAMIR [9,10,11,12]. …”
Section: Predictors Of Prognosissupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Surprisingly, both smoking and obesity were risk factors for AMI development, but were associated with decreased mortality rates after AMI. These phenomena were also observed in KAMIR [9,10,11,12]. …”
Section: Predictors Of Prognosissupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Nearly all studies have reported lower 30-day and 1-year unadjusted mortality for smokers but lower,[6, 7, 10, 11] comparable,[4, 5, 8, 9, 13] or even higher[12] risk of mortality after adjustment. Inconsistencies between studies are likely due to differences in study samples, length of follow-up, covariate adjustment, and the categorization of smokers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the smoker's paradox in cardiovascular disease patients has been partly explained by younger age of onset and fewer coexisting high-risk features in patients with AMI who are current smokers, a small number of studies have shown that the residual lower mortality risk persists despite comprehensive covariate adjustment. 2,[10][11][12][13] Aune et al 14 published a systematic review in 2011 reporting that the paradox was observed in some studies of AMI patients in the prethrombolytic and thrombolytic era, whereas no studies of a contemporary population with acute coronary syndrome have found evidence for such a paradox. Furthermore, some angiographic studies have demonstrated that coronary artery occlusion in smokers is predominantly caused by thrombosis and thus may have a better response to spontaneous or therapeutic thrombolysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%